Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 50

Thread: Using cell phone same as drunk driving

  1. #16
    Join Date
    28th November 2004 - 10:28
    Bike
    Sniff... None
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,575
    sh**, guess i should stop talking on the phone while riding too then...

    seriously, I think the problem is the concentration thing - doesn't matter whether it's a phone/shaver/breakfast/lipstick/blowjob/DVD/newspaper. Some people are better at multi-tasking than others, and that in effect is what it is.

    If you are competent enough to drive at a "safe" level while only requiring 30% of your available concentration, and it only takes you 50% concentration to have a meaningless conversation then you can probably do okay-ish. (Gotta be careful here, I talk and drive too)

    But if you're so f****** incompetent at driving (or driving like a nutter anyway) then you might require 80% concentration just to drive the friggin car in the first place. So if it takes 50% of your concentration to talk on the phone - oh dear, 130%?? Umm, clear the roads fellas!!

    And then there are those people that just require 130% concentration to drive safely anyway... a whole nother thread I think!!
    "You, Madboy, are the Uncooked Pork Sausage of Sausage Beasts. With extra herbs."
    - Jim2 c2006

  2. #17
    Join Date
    15th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    R6
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    271
    Quote Originally Posted by madboy
    seriously, I think the problem is the concentration thing - doesn't matter whether it's a phone/shaver/breakfast/lipstick/blowjob/DVD/newspaper. Some people are better at multi-tasking than others, and that in effect is what it is.
    Ambo's (cops, fireman etc) manage to drive at speed, negotiate every tosspot on the road in the way, operate a radio, cpac unit, lights/siren buttons.........and still arrive safely at destination. If you ask me it comes down to driver skill, and the average driver in nz hasn't got the skills required anymore.

    I'm amazed at how the average driver doesn't even know the length and width of their own vehicle, they can't even park, let alone drive! When i learnt to drive, i wasn't even allowed to drive on the main road until i could pull my car out of a slide on a metal road. Metal road u say, i know i'm old and i'm from hicksville. But jeez pa, least we's could drive back in dem days and still load dat shotgun!
    Everything in moderation, including moderation itself

  3. #18
    Join Date
    18th April 2004 - 19:47
    Bike
    Kawasaki en 450 LTD
    Location
    Rotorua
    Posts
    797
    Quote Originally Posted by scroter
    you ever tryed texting while driving man thats dangerous
    to my shame I admit I have, but you are right it's bloody dangerous and very stupid too, I now pull over and use my phone at the side of the road, a lot better, and I now don't answer calls that ring while I'm driving either, unless I have a passenger who can answer the phone for me and wait for me to pull over so I can answer it properly.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    18th April 2004 - 19:47
    Bike
    Kawasaki en 450 LTD
    Location
    Rotorua
    Posts
    797
    Quote Originally Posted by madboy
    seriously, I think the problem is the concentration thing - doesn't matter whether it's a phone/shaver/breakfast/lipstick/blowjob/DVD/newspaper. Some people are better at multi-tasking than others, and that in effect is what it is.
    !!
    splutter, if you say so MB, I guess it comes down to being distracted at the end of the day, it only takes a split second to not see something because your attention has wandered and it could cost someone their life.
    I have been guilty of doing most of the above mentioned things while driving, ( most not all btw) and consider myself to be very capable of multitasking, I don't think however that anything that impairs concentration while driving is a good idea, no matter what a person's capabilities, noone is superhuman, and unless our cars are equipped with sensors to drive for us to negotiate hazards for us while driving, then I will have to excercise self discipline and consideration for others by restraining from anything other than driving while driving I feel.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    8th December 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Super Adventure 1290s, Bonnie T214
    Location
    Christchurchish
    Posts
    2,284
    Quote Originally Posted by Draco
    Ambo's (cops, fireman etc) manage to drive at speed, negotiate every tosspot on the road in the way, operate a radio, cpac unit, lights/siren buttons.........
    Correct me if I'm wrong - but in fire engines dont the front seat passengers use the radio as oppossed to the driver, the same for ambos, and don't the police use remote Push To Talk buttons (PTT's) on their gear sticks, steering wheels?

    I genuinly don't know the answer, (here it comes....) but back in the UK this was the normal operational procedure for 95% of the emergency services.
    This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:

    Thavalayolee
    You Frog Fucker

  6. #21
    Join Date
    25th May 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Motor Cycle
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    1,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Biff Baff
    Correct me if I'm wrong - but in fire engines dont the front seat passengers use the radio as oppossed to the driver, the same for ambos, and don't the police use remote Push To Talk buttons (PTT's) on their gear sticks, steering wheels?

    I genuinly don't know the answer, (here it comes....) but back in the UK this was the normal operational procedure for 95% of the emergency services.
    There are some minor variations around the world, but that's generally the case. I did read somewhere that NZ highway patrol vehicles also use a text-based alert system, but I'm not familiar with the details.
    Studies tend to focus the problem on the concentration factor, hence the 'hands free kits make little difference' statement. While it's easy to focus your anger at 'people who talk on cellphones while driving', technically they are no different to people who eat dodgy kebabs while driving, people who eat double whoppers while driving, people who change CDs while driving, people who shave while driving, people who use their PDAs while driving, etc, yet there would be little compliance with a law that banned all "distracting" actions while driving.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    27th November 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    None any more
    Location
    Ngaio, Wellington
    Posts
    13,111
    People who text while driving. [Mutter, seethe, fume...]
    "Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]

  8. #23
    Join Date
    8th December 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Super Adventure 1290s, Bonnie T214
    Location
    Christchurchish
    Posts
    2,284
    Quote Originally Posted by Drunken Monkey
    but that's generally the case. I did read somewhere that NZ highway patrol vehicles also use a text-based alert system, but I'm not familiar with the details.
    The radios that the HP use have a Status Message capability. From the front panel of their radios they have the capability to send pre-defined , I.E "Arrived on scene", "On route" and such like. Whether this is enabled at a local level is a local decision. But the vehicle radios that they use are definatley capable of doing this.

    There is a mix of handportable radios in use by the kiwi police such as older Motorola gear and some technical superior Tait radios. The Tait radios, (depending on the model) can also suport text but the Motorola's can't.
    This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:

    Thavalayolee
    You Frog Fucker

  9. #24
    Join Date
    13th April 2004 - 13:57
    Bike
    Riffer
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    477

    and the verdict is

    Quote Originally Posted by Drunken Monkey
    There are some minor variations around the world, but that's generally the case. I did read somewhere that NZ highway patrol vehicles also use a text-based alert system, but I'm not familiar with the details.
    Studies tend to focus the problem on the concentration factor, hence the 'hands free kits make little difference' statement. While it's easy to focus your anger at 'people who talk on cellphones while driving', technically they are no different to people who eat dodgy kebabs while driving, people who eat double whoppers while driving, people who change CDs while driving, people who shave while driving, people who use their PDAs while driving, etc, yet there would be little compliance with a law that banned all "distracting" actions while driving.
    and if you have a crash cause your operating/eating anyone of those thatll be at least one charge of careless driving if your real unlucky carless causing death.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    It's just another dent in LTNZ's credibility. A short drive in any major city will show the dangers of cellphone use while driving. Yet they claim few accidents are caused by it.
    As if anyone involved in an accident will admit to using a phone at the time.
    If we did the right thing when we are cut up by these morons, public demand will then create much smaller, smoother phones. (Aids insertion)

  11. #26
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Biff Baff
    Correct me if I'm wrong - but in fire engines dont the front seat passengers use the radio as oppossed to the driver, the same for ambos, and don't the police use remote Push To Talk buttons (PTT's) on their gear sticks, steering wheels?

    I genuinly don't know the answer, (here it comes....) but back in the UK this was the normal operational procedure for 95% of the emergency services.
    No police vehicles have a transmit button on the steering wheel, that I am aware of. In a two up vehicle the passenger always does the comms, leaving the driver to drive. When you are one up you do the comms as well as drive. The difference between this and the average driver yapping on a cell phone is that the cop car responding to a job has lights and sirens going and the driver is in a very high state of awareness. The cell phone yapper is just driving along in a day dream, not really aware of his / her surroundings.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Biff Baff
    The radios that the HP use have a Status Message capability. From the front panel of their radios they have the capability to send pre-defined , I.E "Arrived on scene", "On route" and such like. Whether this is enabled at a local level is a local decision. But the vehicle radios that they use are definatley capable of doing this.

    There is a mix of handportable radios in use by the kiwi police such as older Motorola gear and some technical superior Tait radios. The Tait radios, (depending on the model) can also suport text but the Motorola's can't.
    The Motorola radios are better if you have to whack someone though.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    8th December 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Super Adventure 1290s, Bonnie T214
    Location
    Christchurchish
    Posts
    2,284
    Quote Originally Posted by spudchucka
    No police vehicles have a transmit button on the steering wheel, that I am aware of. In a two up vehicle the passenger always does the comms, leaving the driver to drive. When you are one up you do the comms as well as drive. The difference between this and the average driver yapping on a cell phone is that the cop car responding to a job has lights and sirens going and the driver is in a very high state of awareness. The cell phone yapper is just driving along in a day dream, not really aware of his / her surroundings.
    Thanks for the clarification Spud - A question for you - when you're solo in your vehicle, do you use the vehicle mobile or your handportable?
    This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:

    Thavalayolee
    You Frog Fucker

  14. #29
    Join Date
    25th May 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Motor Cycle
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    1,180
    Quote Originally Posted by scroter
    and if you have a crash cause your operating/eating anyone of those thatll be at least one charge of careless driving if your real unlucky carless causing death.
    and your point is...?

    Are you saying careless doesn't apply if I'm talking on my phone?

    Talk sense, boy.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    6th November 2004 - 14:34
    Bike
    SUZUKI TR50 STREET MAGIC
    Posts
    2,724
    Quote Originally Posted by SpankMe
    "A University of Utah study claims that drivers who use a cell phone will be 'more impaired than drunken drivers with blood alcohol levels exceeding 0.08.' The study also says that use will turn a driver who is age 20 into age 70. Hands-free systems apparently don't help much either as they still require a driver to 'actively be part of a conversation.'

    I ALSO HEARD THAT A DRUNK DRIVER ON A CELL PHONE WHOS BEEN UP ALL NIGHT IS STILL A BETTER DRIVER THAN AN ASIAN DRIVER WHOS SOBER NOT ON THERE PHONE AND HAS JUST HAD 8 HOURS SLEEP

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •