Making no such statement - care to take your words from my mouth?
I am saying I would not in a million year describe Harry in those terms. He's a good bloke that would rung rings around most in here when it comes time to swinging a spanner and things generally mechanical, and for anyone to abuse him as a man in person on my behalf in well out of order.
I don't see eye to eye with his policies, and at times the approach he's taken to do thing but I can also say that about most on KB as well.
I'm also saying anyone presuming to know my mind and issue it in an abusive public edict is taking one hell of a liberty at my personal expense.
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
Im sorry but Harry, the Harry that my lobby group met with was rude, and arrogant.
When confronted with a polite and professional young lady, with stats sourced under the information act, and our stories, offering solutions to reduce recidivism, his plan a was to trot out "we have done this and improved that..over the last 20 years "
When that didnt move anyone - looking into blank stares of people who are waiting for fresh ideas... he was truly stuck for words, appearing to think throwing the word fuck round, once frustrated - a few times, may sharpen the meeting up and make his point that way.
Even confusing who he was meeting with and becoming confused as to which dead persons rep's he was dealing with.
I dunno if thats how it works down there, because there has been some strong interest and action at solutions offered, however......
I'll be glad to have contact with someone a bit more professional if that is at all possible.
I dont feel the need to write Harry a bonvoyage letter.
ter·ra in·cog·ni·taAchievement is not always success while reputed failure often is. It is honest endeavor, persistent effort to do the best possible under any and all circumstances.
Orison Swett Marden
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
I assume since the "people spoke" for change, this will remind this current bunch that their balance will be wobbly and they will work to stay.
They have some big jobs on...
I have strong feelings that this next few years will be a significant time for changes, heres to the future of fresh pro-active approaches to road safety, relevant to the times, and moving with them.
Heres to a new era. And to working with people that will want to listen
ter·ra in·cog·ni·taAchievement is not always success while reputed failure often is. It is honest endeavor, persistent effort to do the best possible under any and all circumstances.
Orison Swett Marden
Did I say all motorcyclists? Nope, I didn't. So pull your head in and stop being so damned sensitive. You're entitled to your opinion that Duynhoven is a good bloke, even if you are sorely deluded.
Great pun, spoiled only by the fact that you don't know what 'sanctimonious' actually means. But good try...
What's wrong with bus lanes?
Motorbikes are legally allowed to use (almost) all of them.
Yes they are, however, on certain main arterial roads they reduce the capacity off the road by 50%. If traffic planners (and I use that word with the full knowledge that they never do anything of the sort) actually wanted to help traffic move, they'd get rid of the bus lanes, declare the same arterial routes as 24 hour clearways and ensure that traffic lights along them were synchronised to assist with good flow. I challenge anyone who lives in Auckland to come up with a single example of where this takes place.
Buslanes on the motorway should also be accessible to motorbikes and bicycles.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks