There are two rules of thumb here husa.
1/ The smaller the bike, the longer a race seems to take...
2/ The smaller the bike the longer the proportion of a lap it will be on full throttle.
The last is very real and applies regardless of circuit size though obviously bigger circuits show up any shortcomings whether mechanical or cooling, quicker.
Pukekohe in particular was death for small bikes with only two spots each lap where the throttle was closed. Even the aussie V8's were reporting around 60% of each lap on full noise.
The intake length question depends entirely on the rev range to be used.
What rpm at peak and max will be used in the twin.
And re the question about what engines run under 52*C the answer is all of them should be.
Karts run best at around 42 to 45 and any GP bike over 50* is simply throwing away HP - the difference between
50* and 60* is 2 to 3 Hp when making near to 50.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
2T's dominate at Mt Wellington Sunday.
Mt Wellington, First A grade race, two strokes 1 - 2 - 3 and 4. Second A grade race finishing order, two strokes 1 - 2 and 3 with one of the 4 having crashed out, Dave M sets new lap record 28.9 something riding what I think is a Speedpro tuned MB100 based 2T in an Aprilia 50 chassis.
Factual Facts are based on real Fact and Universal Truths. Alternative Facts by definition are not based on Truth.
In this case your understanding is wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_of_fusion
The 210kJ/kg is the enegry taken to push it past 52 degrees.
I accounted for a 10 minute race. That is where 13422kJ came from 22.xxkW x 60 seconds x 10 minutes = 13422kJ.
My assumption was full throttle all the time. This is a common assumption for cooling design. Mainly because if your cooling fails, so does everything else, which is shit.
If you wanted to live on the wild side, you could maybe assume a 50% average throttle (50% of maximum engine power that is) for the entire race. Congrats: 22kg of wax.
Getting fast in A grade. Great to see the 2T's leading the pack. http://www.amcc.org.nz/index.php/men...acingnews.html
Here is the intake model for a HV Lectron 40 with Honda RS125 manifold on CR125 VF3.
This is 3rd harmonic tuned to 11,000 with end correction and 2/3 reed length.
Going 10mm longer gives +1 Hp at 8000 but looses that above 11,000.
Works perfectly on RZ or TZ400 with CR125 reed box welded on.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
for now i think ill stay with the original cylinder inlet and vf4 reed. to give a simple answer, does a short intake manifold usually work better at high rpm than a longer one ?
There is no short answer, as we are talking about the interaction of the particular intake harmonic tuned
length and the petals natural frequency, so its complicated as hell.
You can tune to have the intake length work at peak power to enhance that area, but its just as possible to go alot longer
and pick up a heap of mid, with no loss up top by using a different harmonic.
How much crank power are you shooting for - as the small Banshee VF3 and 4 very quickly run out of flow - also needing big Boyesens
and piston cutouts to work well.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Originally Posted by peewee
But did they only wind-tunnel-test just what shows in your photo, Peewee? Or did they also test the airflow in front of those radiators as disturbed by the tire/rim/brakes/forks/fork-clamps/etc. ??
TeeZee, I like that 3-part bad/okay/good diagram. Notice that in the "good" version, velocity is traded for pressure immediately in front of the radiator core.
Aircooled recip aircraft engines all have "pressure-cowlings." Interestingly, when a cowling was built for the gigantic Pratt & Whitney R4360 28-cylinder radial, with four rows of seven cylinders (two sparkplugs each, 56 per engine), it was found that the aft-most row of cylinders ran cooler than the cylinders in the other three rows!
wobbly im shooting for around 90hp which i dont think is unreasonable if everything is done right. as you know my low temp brazing rod idea failed, atleast for the large amount of welding that needed to be done but im going to have a new tig machine soon, so ill be able to weld all the apropriate areas. inside the trans ducts, water jackets for the aux exh, stud pockets for the boyens, etc.
ill have plenty of case volume, slightly below 1.32. i am a little concearned the 34mm down sloped carbs i just picked up may no be sufficient but i really dont know. maybe they will be fine, one guy claimed he bored some to 36mm but im sure they were extremely thin. vf4 looks good in engmod, far better than the yamaha block. nothing much else i can do besides cut the inlet off and do a cr125 inlet like you mentioned but i dont want to attempt that right now.
i just picked up 2 stock heads. one i plan to use and the other is junk but im going to cut it open and see how thick the combustion chamber is. what i want to do is use the good head with a chamber design like what the rsa had, if theres sufficient material to do so
smitty i have no idea exactly how ktm did the wind tunell test. the only info i have at this time is what i posted, as that was the only info given in the article. could they be stupid enough not to account for all obstructions like you mentioned (tire, forks, fender, etc) ???![]()
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (4 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks