For the radius at the top edge of the exhaust port a practical reason is that it would be quite difficult to get it perfectly tangential with the curvature of the cylinder bore. And for both the exhaust edge radius and the piston edge radius, making them completely tangential will not help the flow.
Both pictures below will show that a full tangential piston edge radius would take away so much of the edge that the ring groove would need to be relocated.
With the piston in BDC it would also create a deeper trough between piston and bore which would create turbulence instead of helping the flow cling to the piston crown. And when the piston is half-way in front of the port and the flow is bumping against it, that lower bit of tangential radius won't make a difference, whether it is there or not.
Attachment 314215 Attachment 314214
If you just radius the piston edge, you will increase the port timing
and improve the flow. Improving the flow is fine; increasing the timing is not always desirable.
We could drop the cylinder until we have the same angle.areas as before the radiusing, but that does not take the improved flow into account.
What we really ought to do, is include the flow coefficient in the angle.area calculation. But that is beyond the scope of engine simulation programs like EngMod; it would require true 3-dimensional CFD.
Bookmarks