A question for Frits (or Luc if you're on here too) now that homologation of the Ryger engine has been achieved, and I assume necessary Patents have been secured even beforehand, what barriers remain before the tech details can be disclosed?
Should we start a Ryger fund, 150 shares at $20 euro each, to buy one in the week they become available?
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
If you look at the legal part of the sonic intakes patent papers, it has lapsed, due to maintenance fees not being paid,need I say more.
But I need some help please Frits.
I am old drinking buddies from Uni with Ron Denis, and he mentioned in a recent email his Honda F1 was proving to be a piece of shit.
So my suggestion was to fit 6 Rygers onto the V6.
Well now that the 1M Euro transfer from McLaren into my Paypal account has gone thru I thought I could start work,and your NDA could easily be made to go away.
The only real problems I have is at each end of the pipe.
But last night I managed to get the 6 into 1 stinger transition working OK in SolidWorks, and now all I really need is the port cores to fit on the other end.
So as its bloody cold here just now it would be great to sit in a pool bar in the Bahamas Hilton and discuss what small changes are needed.
Give Jan a bell and I will arrange the tickets for a couple of weeks work, as im sure he would have a few suggestions on the scavenging regime to help with the project.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Na, not a problem.
As we will be staying at her dads best rooms at the Hilton, Im sure I could ring Paris and she would be glad to do the blowys for all of us.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
So I have one of the very well made ignitech shifter switches. Now I am faced with the choice of ignition cut or Advance reduction in the ignitech settings. I have been told that advance cut is kinder on the gearbox?
Any views from people using this system would be most welcome. Its on the 300 so a touch over 80hp running through what seam like a great street gearbox.
Cheers RB.
The guided piston (like a large valve guide under the piston) would allow for a short very piston ( apart from the bit to cover exhaust port) so transfers would be real short, just like the little bulges in the side of the cylinder we are seeing. The more I think about this the more I'm convinced there are reeds in each transfer, perhaps that's why we are not allowed to see the dyno results as you would see that the chamber is not upsetting transfer flow off the pipe. When the pipe is working, good, but when it's not at least the transfer flow is not stalled and there by upsetting the intake flow. A tight crank case ( no bottom end involved) would promote high transfer pressures. The transfers closest to the carb would probably be weired off so these reeds are direct from the carb, not through the crank case. ????
The reed block we see incoming from the carb will only have reeds on the bottom (like suzuki mudbug etc) heading down into the crank case, the upper half will have the reeds that feed straight into the cylinder right up near the port walls. Make sense? Remember all transfers can be higher than normal now as the flow will only happen when pressures allow and exhaust pressure can not back track down the transfers into the crankcase at all.
Could it be that simple?
There are currently 60 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 60 guests)
Bookmarks