If the timing of the transfer ports is not critical, that leads to the assumption that some method besides symmetrical piston port control is employed to time the transfer of mixture.. Naturally the first thought is control by demand. And since reed technology is what we are familiar with in this context that is our first assumption. But assumptions could also include the timing of the bulk flow of mixture transfer through re-timed pressure differentials. The advantage of such a design in regards to mixture transfer has been documented by Manuel Sevilla Sanz. In the 1980s he pursued an idea of the early DKW engineers to move the majority of the mixture transferred towards the end of the transfer port open period. His method was achieved with a secondary positive displacement piston pump phased to emulate non symmetrical transfer port timings. If a diaphragm type pump were located between the base of the Rygers cylinder and the crankshaft, it could be phased so when the piston uncovers early opening transfer ports the pressure differential above and below the piston is nearly equal. This would result in little initial upward flow through the transfers, but as the cycle continues the pumps phasing would increase the pressure differential and delay the period of time when the bulk of the mixture is transferred. The benefits would include more effective time for blow-down be delaying the time when the bulk of the mixture is transferred. Low pressure differentials at port opening would reduce mixture dilution. Additionally with the fresh mixture spending less time in the cylinder before ex port closing, short circuiting should be reduced.
As to the process the Ryger actually uses, this concept of is pure speculation. Hopefully someone can find it as food for thought... Kermit Buller
Bookmarks