No doubt, you mean the war between four strokes, two strokes and the inefficient use of fuel - (I hope!).
Thread on hydroforming sounds like a good idea - or on making and desigining pipes in general perhaps? especially as this Ryger thing will most probably change things considerably.
Just random thinking (out loud)![]()
What are the dimensions of your dyno roller TZ? Asking for a friend.
Ok, there's no friend. I'm in the planning stage of a dynobuild.
How does your dyno cope with more/less powerfull bikes? I was hoping to be able to run bucketish stuff, but also old 90hp+ force fed fire breathing dirt trackers - might be a bit much to ask for...
Try this:FLYWHEEL.zip
Thanks guys!
Iīll make the exhaust pipe thread, when I have time to do it. Itīs actually quite usual in Finland, that boys even under the age of 16 hydroform exhaust pipes to their mopeds...I think I was something like 14 years old, when me and my friend made the first exhaust pipe, it was ugly as hell and made of cones.
Adegnes: I was not asked, but our DIY dyno has inertia of 5kgm^2 and roller circumference of 1280mm. Rotating mass is about 170kg (including lake-shipīs flywheel and tracror compressorīs belt wheel). Even though, Iīd say that even rather small inertia values can be enough (say 2-3kgm^2 in your case?) when the roller can tolerate high speed pulls and the data logging is accurate enough. Ofcourse there is also that variable, how fast your bikeīs rear wheel tends to spin on top gear pull, say 140kph top speed (with 50rwhp and 5kgm^2 inertia) could easily lead in to too short pull, distorting the natural thermal etc. loads compared to driving situation.
JanBros: Do you mean these pictures?
Thatīs the poor manīs sodium silicate hardener! I use CO2 as MAG welderīs shielding gas, so itīs a good way to "gas" those sodium silicate bindered silica sand cores into solid form. Iīve calculated the right gasing times for different amounts of core material, so no extra gas is accidently added in to the boxes.I can publish those calculations later, in the raport.
War.. If you mean the Soviet thing, thatīs not what Finns are nervous about now. Middle east refugee invasion is happening right now, thankīs to EU...
Tunisti.... Looking forward to hearing a lot more about the projects you have been working on.
red vinamold works well but ive never tried to make a plaster mold over the top of it. i dont see why it wouldnt do fine however. one thing that i found is to put a small amount of 2t oil on your finger and grease the duct walls. this will make removal very easy. have a look at the pdf files i posted if you havent already
one question about hydroformed pipes. are they easier to make and require less tools than coned pipes ? what about if the pipe needed to have several turns ? i would like to try and make a pipe but i dont have anything to cut or roll the cones
There is a real good video on it on pitlane I think. That ended in an argument as well.
I will see if I can find it. I can't it not the one in the thread
this is the thread anyway Howard Gifford is bloody good at it.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.n...8b1e7698dd8b81
http://www.pit-lane.biz/t3107-gp-125...s-welded-cones
Here is some pipes he did
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
yeah, well, according to wob the dyno doesn't lie. From my point of view, there are people who want to try doing it this way and some guidance from those who have done it successfully wouldn't go amiss.
Remember too the pipes made don't just have to be for 2 strokes...which is why a separate thread makes sense.
Personally, i've just done a set of four curved megaphone exhausts for a big CB350/4 - and now know just enough to be dangerous.
Persistence is the answer,
No doubt you had plenty of that when trying to master the art!
Don't allow anyone give you negative criticism if they haven't produced something acceptable themselves or at least made a good effort (with evidence)! - if they have done well, then listen.
When making pipes for the N40 6.5cc engine, the pipes with the sharp edges, ie cones , did not perform as well as the CNC from barstock can parts brazed together. There was numerous challenges to make the sections in 1 operation, instead of making the inner shape and transferring to a mandrel for the outer. I even made some steel pipes to see the differences in performance. All the CNC section pipes out performed the cone pipes for our engine at the time. I have not done more pipes for a while as the one we have is still doing everything we need from it.
Neil
There are currently 30 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 30 guests)
Bookmarks