Page 1325 of 2703 FirstFirst ... 3258251225127513151323132413251326132713351375142518252325 ... LastLast
Results 19,861 to 19,875 of 40542

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #19861
    Join Date
    18th July 2015 - 16:21
    Bike
    2015 Avanti
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by 2005bully View Post
    As far as piston breakage. Most often breakage that is caused by piston acceleration starts as cracks in the transfer cut outs. If the piston has no cutouts those related stress risers are eliminated. The stress on the rod and piston are greatest near the top of the stroke. Faster combustion properly timed would to some extent help reduce those stresses. (small effect and only under full throttle) 100 to 135cc kart engines with careful consideration's will give acceptable rod and bearing life at extended run periods of 20,000 or higher rpms. That is a long ways from 30,000rpms. BUT I do not recall it ever being stated that the Ryger makes its most usable power at 30,000rpm's. Just that it is capable of running to that high of rpm's. Maybe acceptable piston life will be in minutes not hours???? Kermit Buller
    In model engines, the 1st sign of impending failure is the gudgeon pins flogging out , the other failure is piston collapse or a hole in the piston if run too lean.
    It seems we are all looking for more complex things or arrangements rather than looking for more simple. Sometimes simple seems to be too simple and then we look at all the negatives we can think of,instead of the positive and the advantages of simple. If a conversion is done in a day or so, the same time as rebuilding an engine with a rod change, it can not be complicated in order to be done in that time frame.
    Neil

  2. #19862
    Join Date
    27th October 2013 - 08:53
    Bike
    variety
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    942
    hey frits in the photo with your hand over the engine top (previous pg), why is the carb not at the same angle as the cylinder inlet ? is it only because there isnt a suitable carb that can operate at that steep downward angle or is it some other reason ?

    can anybody else make out whats just below the carb, the area where the carb would be if it was using the crankcase inlet ?

  3. #19863
    Join Date
    16th September 2015 - 06:10
    Bike
    Harley SShovelhead
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Lightbulb View Post
    No, looking from the cylinder top down at the bore, you would see regular ports.Likewise looking through the exhaust port, all will look normal.
    Neil
    But if the piston is stepped and I moved the piston from top to bottom and looked in the exhaust port, I dont think that what I would see would be normal looking, or did I miss some info as to what would prevent me from seeing the step?

  4. #19864
    Join Date
    30th April 2009 - 15:26
    Bike
    TAKA by TAS MOTOR
    Location
    42­° South
    Posts
    68
    Quote Originally Posted by MotleyCrue View Post
    But if the piston is stepped and I moved the piston from top to bottom and looked in the exhaust port, I dont think that what I would see would be normal looking, or did I miss some info as to what would prevent me from seeing the step?
    A KR-1 piston is 60mm long - the stroke is 50.6mm
    If I look up the exhaust port at TDC - do you think I can see the last 10mm/bottom of the skirt?

    Frits said that because it gives away nothing... sit in the exhaust what do you see nothing but skirt



    "Even with the piston at BDC you would not notice that it is a Ryger engine... "
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Ryger-VM%20cylinder%2001.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	238.4 KB 
ID:	316377  

  5. #19865
    Join Date
    16th September 2015 - 06:10
    Bike
    Harley SShovelhead
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Leed View Post
    A KR-1 piston is 60mm long - the stroke is 50.6mm
    If I look up the exhaust port at TDC - do you think I can see the last 10mm/bottom of the skirt?
    I guess you have a point there.

  6. #19866
    Join Date
    12th March 2010 - 16:56
    Bike
    TT500 F9 Kawasaki EFI
    Location
    Hamilton New Zealand
    Posts
    2,877
    Quote Originally Posted by breezy View Post
    i expect you have already spun this crank set up with something attached externally?, obviously not under load. how did it go? (you may have posted these findings previously, sorry to ask again ) in reality i expect if its good enough for 17500-20000 rpm it would be job done
    Breezy, I do have another crank system designed without a beam but that definitly stays in the draw for now, might be too embarrassing to show off
    It allows for liner movement only, no centrifugal on the big end. Rod, bigend and piston can be one part, no gudgin pin at all. NO cams or cam rollers or cam tracks and is not single sided. BUT I would like to see it work before I open my big mouth!

  7. #19867
    Join Date
    8th March 2014 - 20:40
    Bike
    V50
    Location
    Deutschland
    Posts
    34
    https://www.google.com/patents/DE102...IVxJMsCh0e0gMT

    Passage 0023
    Maybe in the rygerspacer is a simple transfer header contur, we usualy see in exhaust systems.


    Passage 0026
    Describes the effect of scavenging with higher speed.

  8. #19868
    Join Date
    30th April 2009 - 15:26
    Bike
    TAKA by TAS MOTOR
    Location
    42­° South
    Posts
    68

    The Ryger Conspiracy

    could be made of 3 systems:
    1. CYLINDER REED INDUCTION (top end)
    2. '4T' BOTTOM END with 'reeded' inlet breather & 'reeded' crankcase outlet,
    3. Pressure accumulator/receiver, for higher pressure charge injection

    conventional Torque output is variable over a single stroke.
    what IF it was more variable over two piston strokes...
    if Tstroke2 = 2*Tstroke1 : every second stroke sequence Ts3 = Ts1
    then Taverage = (Ts1 + Ts2)/2
    mathematically you might get 70hp

    ^^^.....just a brain burp.... Ryger makes more power by sustaining near peak torque under increased revolutions

  9. #19869
    Join Date
    19th June 2011 - 00:29
    Bike
    KR-1S, KR1-SV, KXR500, ZXR 4/600
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by Leed View Post
    to make 70hp at 30,000
    it doesn't.
    it makes 70BHP at 17.500 and is capable of revving 30.000 but for how long is still not known.

  10. #19870
    Join Date
    20th April 2011 - 08:45
    Bike
    none
    Location
    Raalte, Netherlands
    Posts
    3,396
    Quote Originally Posted by Leed View Post
    the head may be standard 2T but what screws into the sparkplug hole? see Frits' photo attached hiding air injection/ignition?
    I already explained that, Leed. In the spark plug hole there is nothing but a spark plug. I just put my hand on the plug cap to program my body into remembering where that plug cap was, because I didn't want to hurt my elbow while driving. At that same instant a photo was taken that went all over the internet.
    Because of the flood of far-fetched reactions to this first photo we decided to put our hands on the plug cap again. And it worked again, as your reaction proves

    we see a standard alloy crown in mock up - doesn't mean it doesn't run with a ceramic one
    There is no mock-up and I already stated that there are no ceramics.

    if a light weight rod can be used then why is it shorter - is the short rod necessary must be to accommodate a linkage or modification of the stroke cycle
    Already answered: a long rod can be used as well but it would make the engine higher.

    Modena KZ1... removable insert built with thermally insulating material, to maintain mixture temperature and improve volumetric efficiency'
    as wobbly has alluded, with every factor involved, perhaps it is blueprinted from a pool best achievable ideas. anyone remember theglobe.com
    The removable insert in the Modena engine was an idea from my friend Roland Holzner, Modena's technical director.
    The suggestion to use a thermo-insulating material for the insert was mine.

  11. #19871
    Join Date
    20th April 2011 - 08:45
    Bike
    none
    Location
    Raalte, Netherlands
    Posts
    3,396
    Quote Originally Posted by peewee View Post
    hey frits in the photo with your hand over the engine top (previous pg), why is the carb not at the same angle as the cylinder inlet ? is it only because there isnt a suitable carb that can operate at that steep downward angle or is it some other reason ?
    That downward angle isn't steep at all and the carb could easily be fitted with a straight inlet rubber; it would even improve the flow somewhat.
    But then the carb and the airbox would be pointing upward in the same space where the driver's elbow is. Re-arranging a carb is easier than re-arranging an elbow.

  12. #19872
    Join Date
    26th April 2013 - 21:55
    Bike
    BMW R1200R 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    139
    Frits, the vast majority of the existing 2 stroke MX engines have case reed induction. In fact, the only cilinder reed engine is the yamaha YZ 250.
    Is that a problem for 'rygerising' those existing engines ? Or can both types of engine be converted tot the ryger technique ?

  13. #19873
    Join Date
    20th April 2011 - 08:45
    Bike
    none
    Location
    Raalte, Netherlands
    Posts
    3,396
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1962 View Post
    Frits, the vast majority of the existing 2 stroke MX engines have case reed induction. In fact, the only cilinder reed engine is the yamaha YZ 250. Is that a problem for 'rygerising' those existing engines ? Or can both types of engine be converted tot the ryger technique ?
    No problem as far as the Ryger principle is concerned. The only problem I can think of, is one of space: can you lodge the carb between the cylinder and the air filter on those machines?

  14. #19874
    Join Date
    23rd September 2015 - 05:11
    Bike
    does Playstation count?
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    27
    Could there possibly be any tuning benefit to using a rotary valve intake or would that upset the Ryger timing somehow?

  15. #19875
    Join Date
    30th April 2011 - 04:57
    Bike
    bsa. honda. aprilia
    Location
    england
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by Flettner View Post
    Breezy, I do have another crank system designed without a beam but that definitly stays in the draw for now, might be too embarrassing to show off
    It allows for liner movement only, no centrifugal on the big end. Rod, bigend and piston can be one part, no gudgin pin at all. NO cams or cam rollers or cam tracks and is not single sided. BUT I would like to see it work before I open my big mouth!
    would you think that if the highest combustion pressure occuring in this engine happend well after tcd that it would relieve the stress on the crank set up? trying to find out about hcci, has this been confirmed as whats going on in the engine?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 68 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 68 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •