How about a comedy thread? plenty of talent here!
It all reminds me of the girls at school who were either 'bitching' or 'not speaking'.
![]()
How about a comedy thread? plenty of talent here!
It all reminds me of the girls at school who were either 'bitching' or 'not speaking'.
![]()
Turns out that the vast majority know what we wantand what we don't like
.
Mission accomplished?
I personally like to read about and see TZ's bikes, what this thread was all about until it got hijacked way back when.
How many people here race Buckets?
Ironically, and I do mean ironically, I believe Sidecar Bob has...
No disrespect TZ, but you must wonder some days where the "flash mob" came from...
Anyway, each to their own, rant over.![]()
Did someone say flash mob???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqnORZOxL98
I don't race, but only because I can't even throw a leg over the seat and if I could and fell off that would be curtains for me! ( I fell over in Bunnings carpark one day, ended up in hospital and nearly karked it) but ....... Still doesn't disqualify me from being interested though!!
Flettner, I can't contribute much of course but I will do what I can, hopefully enough to to pad things out occasionally.
That bike is a thing of beauty.
Whip the engine out and throw a watercooled MB100 in it. Tell me I'm not the only one thinking how it would go in bucket racing.
We have been doing some more tests again. This time we were looking at rpm changes from one cycle to the next. Also tested two different pipes compared to the last lot of tests that were done. In addition, this time the frequency of the monitoring was increased from 1 mhz to 16mhz for the hall effect sensor in the engine back plate as it looks at the crank pin going past. We added a thermocouple onto the header pipe, but the 1st one came loose so changed the connection type on the second pipe. Also did some more analysis when the engine was stopping at the end of the run. The most staggering find was the rate of deceleration when the fuel was shut off and was slowing down. At 35 K the rate of slow down due to the prop load is a staggering 621 rev change to the next, so this occurred at only 0.0017 seconds, that is a rate of 355622 revs per second. So the variations from rev to rev at 200 to 400 rpm change is definitely very real and well inside the possibilities of the rate of deceleration.
The other part that was and still is very confusing is the 2 pipes. They are cnc made from bar stock with very similar volumes, the std performance pipe
has stinger of 4.5mm the slow pipe has stinger of 4.6mm , the slow pipe is 1.6 mm longer, but is 1600 to 1700 rpm slow. Only could do 38100 rpm, compared to 39700 of the std pipe. The header temp on the slow pipe is around 230 to 235 C, unsure of the header temp of the 1st run.
The graphs show the rpm on the bottom and pipe temp in the upper. top graph is temp/time, the lower graph is rpm/time
The crosses on the lower graph represents the trigger points with the hall effect sensor at tdc. We have not added the other hall effect sensors to monitor the quadrants just yet.
Neil
That is very interesting, very impressed by how you are finding ways of making meaningful measurements with an engine that revs to 38K + rpm.
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)
Bookmarks