sorry alittle late but ive been working a million hours it seems. some racers probly only ride the machine and know jack shit about the rest of the bike so you would have to narrow down the criteria further. in many places like north america, a 2t tuner simply meens a person who adjusts carburetors, again you would have to narrow things down even further. maybe all the way down to only the folks who do their own work, design their own parts, build their own stuff to the best of their meens, of course proof would be required as talk is cheap now days. ive always thought this section of the site should be private, with proof of past or current projects theyve done. this should keep out 99% of the trouble makers and lurkers who are likely just stealing the info, copying it and passing it off as their own brilliant ideas. you listening moderators ?
while im thinking of it i managed to find a bit of time today to finish the exterior on one of the cylinders![]()
when the welds are grinded flat with the burr it just goes shiny on its own. clean aluminum i suppose. u never welded anything i guess. but it is gonna be alot faster than with the pencil dick sized aux ports. sorry i offended you some how. perhaps your a lurker stealing info ?
Thanks guys for the input.
I know that every so many piston /liner sets, you will get one that goes exceptionally well. Yet when you look at roundness, rate of taper from exhaust to tdc, taper from bdc to bottom of the liner etc, you will find nothing.
There will be fast liner sets with out of round liners, by as much as 0.01mm , you will get fast ones that are round to less than 0.001mm. Some will have more taper, some will have less taper. I think the best ones are the ones where the actual port machining is just right. As cutters dull, the ports get smaller. I have seen where the bottom of the exhaust port was widened by 0.1mm and it dropped a whole lot of power.
So I will try some stuff , and will report what works. No point posting what does not work, cause I don't have enough time to type those up.
Neil
There is a good reason for it, I will see if I can find Frits original Post.
As a geometric compression ratio, I am at about 16.5:1 or so, sometimes lower sometimes higher, depending on the density altitude. Slowly we are starting to find a correlation to compression and the number of head shims in an engine and the density Altitude, but seems that the RAD % is making more sense in tuning, especially for the needle valve position.
But as we go faster, it seems to change a little, as more load is on the engine the more fuel it can handle, and it seems that it actually seems that it needs more compression to get it to run properly. That maybe why Alex runs a 19:1 compression ratio, and may well be the only way to get them to run at over 290 k's and then they use the fuel to assist in the cooling of the engine, not just the air.
Neil
There are currently 21 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 20 guests)
Bookmarks