First time in years that I have felt qualified to comment on the content of this thread.
Now you re talking
Fucking light weight racers
I do like KFC
I have already started buying the extension cords
Bravo!Originally Posted by TZ350
Will you make a place in the class for this guy?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLLs_KnT0Lk
No sorry, but under "Thread Tools" which is near the top right hand side of the page, you can "View Thread Images" and sort them into 70 per page. When you find an interesting image click on the N/A sign to see the post, there are more than 7,000 images.
When I was playing with EFI I did use a A/F meter but with a 2T there are traps as the A/F reading is seemingly rich when the trapping efficiency is not good, like when you are moving away from peak torque or well out of the power band.
The A/F meter accuracy seemed at its best when the rpm was at peak torque, every where else it indicated varying degrees of rich but was not. Frits put me on to this, the indicated richness was just air/fuel being blown through the exhaust port and lost down the pipe the remaining air/fuel that got trapped in the cylinder burnt correctly, all the air/fuel was of the correct strength for good combustion just some was not trapped and consequently lost and looked to the meter like the engine was running rich when in fact it was not.
So, HCCI, how good is that. I've just been reading up on the ignition process (google it) and it turns out we have been heading down the wrong track with spark plugs all this timeHCCI process is best at everything ...... accept being able to control it under all engine conditions
There seems to have been a lot of research on this process and only Ryger appear to have cracked it, and they still run a spark plug. Imagine having a non direct injection engine running with no spark plug, model engines do it with compression adjustment to get the timing crack on. Be it at only constant RPM. Thoughts anyone?
From what I have read HCCI has been the next big thing for 30+ years. Lot of controls needed making the usual complexity of a modern ECU 4 stroke OEM auto engine even more complex than it already is, and yet it still only works at part load. HCCI might work in the Ryger at just the right conditions, but working under all conditions without extensive ECU controls and such, only in dreams I think.
It is highly unlikely that the Ryger is running full load HCCI. Remember, Honda could not do it on a two-stroke, and the Car companies can not either. HCCI is a part load thing, and usually utilized to improve fuel consumption in the lower part load area. By the way, although many car manufacturers have road tested HCCI in prototypes on the test bench and on the road, there is not a single car on the market being sold which uses HCCI, afaik.
If the Ryger should be working without a spark plug at some high rpm / high load areas, then it is much more likely preignition than HCCI. If it needs a smaller radiator despite more than usual power, then it can still have a more efficient burn compared to conventional engines, but that efficient burn won't be what is usually called HCCI or CAI.
Do you think it will be a good idea to dump the same HCCI information overload on the rest of the gang here Neil? Oh well, here y'all go. Bring your own aspirin.
EDIT: after trying to upload three times I discovered that the maximum permitted file size for ZIP-files is 2MB. My HCCI.ZIP is 22,2 MB....
Honda had success with EXP-2 in the 1995 Paris-Dakar rally, but then what?
"In 1995 Honda re-entered the Paris-Dakar with a bang. The EXP-2 was a radically new and different motorbike, equipped with a revolutionary 400ccm two-stroke engine. After two weeks of racing the african dessert Jean Brucy finished 5th overall and first place in the under-500ccm class."
http://www.honda-museum.com/honda-exp-2/
I'm very much looking forward to the Ryger debut.
There are currently 21 users browsing this thread. (2 members and 19 guests)
Bookmarks