Hi Harry, you need to mention this is an early moder KR150 , the one with wire wheels.
You have a few options, buy a new cylinder from Malaysia, Indonesia or Thailand, Get it welded and replated , get a second hand one, last resort would be sleeving it. There is a guy on KB in New Plymouth that has or had KR's his user name is ride life or something his name is Alex
My neighbours diary says I have boundary issues
Yes a flat curve is what to wish for.
But i thought the abrupt stop in raising torque to an almost flat curve is a limiter.
And when i anlyzed the dyno rpm curve against the engine rpm curve i saw that, gear ratio altered from 10.3 to 10.6 just in the area where the curve flattens out.
'Locked' the dyno has gear ratio 10.3, no slippage.
This means when engine is revving 10300rpm the dyno revs 1000rpms.
And when slippage occur the engine revs 10600 and dyno revs 1000rpms.
A small value maybe, but it makes it 'not correct'.
I will sort this out and make a pull again to se what it does without slip.
rgds
Patrick
More Ryger thoughts. Reading a bit more about HCCI, perhaps there is some possibility that the rate of compression might be a factor. So then I got thinking about the recent Honda 2 stroke patent.
What is that complex mechanism for, why not a simple crank? So we scaled the Honda drawing, chucked it into Solidworks, scaled the stroke to 54.5, such that we could do a direct travel vs piston travel comparison with an engine (Ryger?) that has the 54.5 stroke, 90 rod and with no significant offset of the cylinder axis or piston pin.
From this, it can be seen that one side of the travels are almost identical, but there is a significant difference on the other side. Maybe this difference is what Honda was trying for, assuming (yes I know another assumption) that it was beneficial for some reason, maybe HCCI or ATAC. As the direction of rotation, it could be that the side of the Honda engine, that shows the sharper rate of travel, represents the compression stroke ie, read the plot from right to left.
Anyways, 31 days to go, unless Wobbly gets some advance info.
Ok Frits, how are we going to build a continuous fuel injection system, not pulsed.
The old Hiborn mechanical fuel injection was crude at best but if we were to put a electronically controlled needle valve in place of the return "pill" it could work? Or as you have suggested a DC motor driven by pules width modulation.
We can do better than that can't we? I don't like the big choke thing in the inlet. I guess we could just use an airflow sensor now?
Youre right tjbw, the rod angularity is small reducing piston side thrust friction.
There are also lots of other observations about the engine:
1. It is very under square, with a bore/stroke ratio of around 0.45:1
2. The above means that the combustion chamber can be more favourable in its shape to achieve a smaller surface area/volume ratio, enhancing efficiency.
3. It does feature a spark plug, maybe indicating that it needs this to start, something the Lohman 18 cc seemed to struggle with
4. Extremely ordinary scavenge passages, maybe not an issue with the low speed, long stroke, uniflow design
5. Crankcase compression ratio of almost zero
6. Crankcase seems to have lots of nooks and crannies for lub oil to hang up in.
7. Put a bit of effort into the cooling of piston ring belt at TDC
(with the liner being wet at this level), maybe because there is zero cooling of this at BDC
8. Looks to be a low speed (around 3000 rpm tops) industrial engine and expensive to make
9. Maybe, if it is ATAC, they have just gone full on to achieve the lowest BSFC ever.
Wobbly, thanks for Vegas report, and well done.
What would be the effect of the det mushroom on egt at the det mushroom location if you didn't change jets?
I think local egt would increase, and mixture returned to the cylinder would be warmer, this combined with the turbulance you mentioned resulting in a more homogeneous mix.
I developed the continuous injection idea for a 6,5 cc model engine that revs past 35.000 rpm, so no chance in hell that I would ever find an injector that's quick enough. I decided upon a gear pump driven by a pulse width modulated electromotor and a spring-loaded injection nozzle that I posted here before. As flow sensors, MAP sensors, Lambda sensors and the like are all too big for this engine, and as it's an unthrottled (always WOT) engine, I planned to use only an engine rpm / pump rpm lookup table. Crude as this would be, it would be an improvement on the present carburation system that depends on a pre-set (before flight) needle and exhaust pressure.
Of course such an rpm/rpm lookup table is totally insufficient if you want any throttle control and rideability.
An Ecotrons EFI system for really small engines:- http://www.ecotrons.com/products/uav-engine-efi/
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Bookmarks