The class isn't and never was solely based around kart track racing. The GP was run at Ohakea , then Taupo (and at Mt Wellington for maybe a year or two). The Tokoroa GP has only been around since 2012, and unless I'm mistaken we have had zero south islanders attend.
![]()
this is so cool talking buckets in the ESE thread again![]()
i'm over buckets
Compare Pornography now to 50 years ago.
Then extrapolate 50 years into the future.
. . . That shit's Nasty.
Hmm well I'll see if I can post a pic but this tablet is a piglet.
No, fail, maybe later when on a PC.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
That's the best thing I've read on here for some time, infact we detune our motors to make them easier to ride...... We are still waiting for one of your mega hp rockets to come down and take the BOB north. I suppose a 14 year old on a "standard" FXR taking third place in GP for the development (old street stock) class at the first round of the nationals up against RG's KR's and ninja 250's was a fluke? Granted we might not have the peak HP that some of your bikes have but we also need some reliability to sustain the long periods of full RPM required at Ruapuna and Levels. Ask DieselPig how many Pistons his RG100 has eaten in the quest of full track glory. Stock motors bwhahaha!
Its harder to lose weight than gain horsepower.
Thanks for the flowers Bjorn. Here you go:
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...post1130452977
Frits,
I am tinkering a bit on your FOS design, and I did a nice experiment you might want to look into. maybe it's garbage, maybe not.
Basically I am doing static flow simulations, and i look at the amount of flux intersecting a plane near the head, with different parameters.
Normally I am always a bit behind the coventional scavenging, But I found out that using a 25 degrees taper in the last centimeter of the transfer ducts, there is almost an 80% gain in the upward flow (towards the head). the mass flow measured at exhaust ducts is unchanged, so this proves i'm not fooling myself.
I know static simulations mean very little, but I also have an understating of the correlations yamaha found out on that sae paper, i'm using their method, and the flux reaching the head (or better, crossing a reference plane 30% of the stroke from the head) is in good correlation with the scavenging quality.
I have a grasp that the FOS scavenging quality is good only "on the pipe", so i was hoping to improve it a bit.
I'm a bit away from engines these days, i know this is mostly fried air, sorry, but i need to keep the mind active sometimes. and sharing is caring...
here's a hint on the taper i am talking about
![]()
Will it be possible to change scavenging models like ESE to handle two strokes with exhaust valves and unsymmetric timing?.
As I se it, two strokes with piston controled exhausts, is a dying breed.
With enough workmanship a lot of things are possible, but the point is always the same, we want 2-strokes for simplicity, once you add mechanical complexity you might want to consider a 4 stroke. Just double the capacity and the power comes out easily. even easier than with 2 stroke
unless you cannot double the capacity, then you are in racing. And in racing there's not a big point in having a super-flat power curve (because that's the reason for exhaust valves and unsymmetric timing)
Ciao Nasone, come va?
In addition to my calculations I did some flow tests too before drawing the cylinder, and your findings agree nicely with mine. Take a look; those angles are all there.
(Axial angles 25°, radial taper 22,5°)
Niels, Piston-controlled exhaust ports open with a velocity of over 1,5 times the mean piston speed. Fourstroke-type exhaust valves open with an initial velocity of zero; they cannot possibly achieve the required blowdown angle.area. And if you enlarge the bore-stroke ratio in order to accommodate bigger valves, you will lose transfer angle.area. In return your engine will become twice as complicated. Doesn't seem a difficult choice to me.
That's simply fantastic to hear Frits! thank you. Fuel for my mind.
I want to share a thought with the others here, again about the ryger concept. I took a random wave pressure animation in an exhaust pipe (Vannik's great job here)
the first big pulse coming out and reflecting back is the one we already put to great use.
if you look carefully, after the exhaust port closes, there are still waves going back and forth in the exhaust.
Or better, there's a full wave cycle to be exploited there, when the piston hovers around TDC. with the lowest pressure ratio being exactly like the one we use to suck from the cylinder, and the highest pressure ratio in the 1.5 range.
As someone previously suggested, the port under the exhaust port could be connected to the exhaust port, through the "fake booster" channels in the drawing.
with the right timing there's a lot of potential to overfill the crankcase.
just my 2 cents.
I have seen a note at the European patent office regarding the Ryger patent from December 2007 that it was withdrawn in July 2009. Can anybody here confirm this?
There are currently 22 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 22 guests)
Bookmarks