Unfortunately I don't have a thread anymore.but you can ask anything you like.
That rectangle is not hiding anything of the engine. There was just a logo of the previous brand i worked for. But i don't want free advertising. even less for bad people.
these are some pictures of the cylinder.
porting is 200° ex, 129° A , 131° B C
not completely sure, but close enough.
the big molds.
the small ones are from two 52mm bore engines (with pass-thru bolts) this is 50mm bore. look at the difference.
My friend Sprocatti casted this cylinder for me. I went to him and we worked together on the cores.
I made a T-port because it is easier to work with, since i have less experience on booster ports and his booster ports cores were very different from the RSA. and i don't plan to use a closed piston pin, so I thought i would not exploit the full potential and bore width of booster ports anyway.
now I understand the other advantages of the boost ports. but hey, it's done.
![]()



but you can ask anything you like.
Reply With Quote






) amounts of low end torque, or shall I say toughness. It's not very well shown in the dyno graphs, but in real life the runnability changes dramatically, engine tolerates rpm's much lower than idle when crawling in forests, throttle response is better and it doesn't care if you slam WOT at very low rpm's. The engine runs much cooler too, and tends to be less sensitive to spark fouling. Good functionality required only jetting. After those dyno graphs the ignition advance was turned a bit earlier, leading to better overall curve and max torque/hp.

Bookmarks