http://www.crash.net/motogp/news/226...of-man-tt.html
What a great news![]()
This is my first pass at modeling a motor in Engmod.
There are a lot of parameters that I am not familiar with so I have started with the Honda RS125 engine model Engmod supplied as a base point for things like the Delay, Duration, Vibe-A and Vibe-B in combustion settings along with the wall temperatures
The NSR300-2015 is as per the spec we ran our motors this season. The power output in Engmod is about 11% more than what we measured on the Dyno. The Curve is very close though and Engmod predicted Det (which we have battled all season)
The NSR330 v1.0 is What I am planning on running this season (Although the Capacity will actually be 317cc as i've had to reduce the stroke for deck height reasons) No Det predicted this time!
Interestingly, both simulations use the same flow widths and general port geometry as each other only the port heights and reed valve have changed significantly.
In NSR300-2015 sim changing to the Vforce reed made no difference however it makes a massive difference in the NSR330 sim though. I suspect this is to do with the increase of crankcase volume in the NSR330 sim. Perhaps this is because the Vforce is better with the weaker intake pressure differential?
I'm yet to play with the power valve settings to optimise it for the NSR330 file as it looks like it's opening too early.
I'm going to cut up my spare barrel tomorrow so I can verify my port measurements and hopefully get a more accurate model.
Very very addictive piece of software.
Addictive ? Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
![]()
Very interesting to see how others use EngMod and how you solve different issues.
I feel I'm way behind with my base model.![]()
EngMod is depicting crankshaft Hp, and I have found that a good sim will have around 12% more power over a Dynojet
showing rear wheel Hp.
This is entirely predictable with primary drive, gearbox gears/oil drag, chain and tyre losses to the drum.
You can also take your Dyno curve, add 12% in the software and display that with the sim result - dead cool.
The latest software has a new pipe heat release model incorporated, and for a racebike like the NSR you should use rpm driven pipe temp.
325*C at the start of the powerband and 425*C at peak power, say 8000 and 12,000.
If using a solenoid powerjet then this is modeled best by going to 450* in the overev.
Do you understand how to input the correct numbers for your actual combustion parameters, as this is very important to detecting, then eliminating deto.
If not I will do a show and tell as TeeZee likes.
Re the bypass thermostat, yes it starts to close at 42*C, and is fully closed by about 48*.
Thus as I said it will allow the engine to reach 42* in no time, then it cycles up and down, keeping the temp at around 50* ( due to hysteresis ) continuously no matter how cold
or hot the ambient temp is.
As long as your rad is capable of overcooling, it will hold it at 50* all day - every day.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Has a common crankcase ever been tried on a 90 degree? Someone with better knowledge than me (like 99% of the people in here) that has a good guess if it will work well or not?
Would like to buy two as soon as you have them available.
Show and tell please!
Yes, in 1981 Jean Bertrand Bruneau (JBB) made a V2 90 degrees two stroke GP engine, with common crankcase. It was a marvel.
He is a genius. http://www.pit-lane.biz/t5627p180-ol...e-une-histoire
True about Jean Bertrand being a genius; not true about his V2-engine having a common crankcase. The separation between the left and right cases was taken care of by the center part of the crankshaft. It was grooved; the groove carried a 'piston ring' that expanded when fitted and then was stationary in the cases, forming a labyrinth seal.
![]()
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)
Bookmarks