Dunno if it´s been tested, but is the injector placed so it injects 'upstream' against airflow in secondary transfers?
What i refer to is that air is so light, and fuel is so heavy.
The injectorflow will reduce speed in airflow.
Or is fuel injected when transfers is closed?(then no problem with airspeed)
If injectorbeam is flowing WITH airflow, you can actually get a small increase of airflow(ejector effect).
Rgds
Patrick
A stock F9 is 28HP, and that's a 350.
Yes secondary injectors are against the airflow in the B transfers. I read somewhere that against the airflow aided mixing. I hope they were right.
Second dyno session. Red is where we were last night, Blue 27.5hp is where we got to tonight. 28 looks very possible 30 maybe with a bit of work on the cylinder.
Also because the head insert is 2mm deeper than normal the combustion chamber is a crazy shape, looks very much like the old Kawasaki top hat design. To get it any better requires a total re design of the head cover and insert. It needs an insert that I can sink the plug down into.
And the inlet timing is, opens 135 BTDC and closes 90 ATDC. With the big disk I really don't need that much duration so I will try closing it earlier.
Injecting against the airflow does help mixing. Each fuel droplet encounters more air. And hopefully the air stream will consume or at least slow down those droplets before they hit a wall and form large drops again.
Can you rotate the inlet disc? 145°/80° should function OK and you would not have to make a new disc.
That's a flat torque curve for a 2 stroke TZ!
Yes. they´re correct.
But also am i.
I have seen losses in power on foulstrokes when people getting creative with injectors
Same story with shooting a lot of nitrous into an inlet manifold, suddenly the carburetor can stop doing it´s job, due to high loss of airspeed.
Therefor there is an market with special built holley carbs to people who want´s to shoot huge amounts of nitrous.
Rgds.
[QUOTE=wobbly;
Wobbly, did you ever think or try to turn the exhaust duct 'upside down'?
Now I think it could be better for flow, especially blow-down.
We once did a small and inconclusive test at Aprilia.
But not really well done....
Not nearly enough I think now.
I mean with a 'hollow' underside, like an original ROTAX has.
And the same restricted duct size as we use now, filling in the top side.
So keeping the same volume and port size.
And Frits, what do you think?
Something like this Jan?
Tz , what kind of radiator are You using and did You measured the water temp?
But Jan has also stated that the optimum down angle of the roof he tested was 25*.
Maybe increasing this,along with lowering the floor at the port exit could be "better ".
Maybe I can get to try this idea with Franco at TM - the roof change would be easily done by scraping the core,but a hollow floor
would need a CAD change, not as easy.
Fear not, I want to do it.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
On a twostroke i would say yes!
Once you trapped the air engine draws in and start building pressure, you add pressure with nitrous injection.
And get very very good mixture as nitrousbeam will blend it all up.
And a huge tempdecrease as nitrous shots get very cold.
This will also increase 'VE' on the twostroke, works a bit like an intercooler.
On foulstroke it would be a disaster![]()
There are currently 15 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 15 guests)
Bookmarks