Looks good.
I would be pretty interested in what others think. This type of fuel will be more and more available at the pump everywhere in time. Metholated spirits is available at hardware stores everywhere now and 8.5 L of metholated spirits and 1.5L of 96 is the same thing as Gull pro. So should fuels becoming available to the public at the petrol station pump be allowed for general use in Buckets?
There has been a thread started over here by Fastfred:- http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...post1131007011
No, OH&S/material safety regulations state that gas containers must be of approved type, not allowed to pour in a bloody bucket.
( heheheh...)
& since racebikes are 'not for highway use' then avgas ( it is pump gas at aero-clubs) oughta still be ok..
2T's like a bit of TEL, & it is still available as an additive 'Kemco Octane Supreme 130' if you want to do a bit of blending.
www.hi-flow.com/hp016aOS.html
When was the last time anyone's bucket race-gas was protested/analysed?
Yeah, but only where Gull has outlets - which at the moment AFAIK is limited to the Auckland area. Certainly only in the NI anyway.
Remember that it was a couple of National racers bringing their own Gull fuel South to the Southern national meetings that caused the shitfight over fuel a season or so back. Personally I'd like to see open fuel come back but that won't happen....But I'm sure that if guys bring this fuel South there will be protests. Missing from the definition is "available nation wide"
As an amusing aside, 98 is not available in Invercargill to my knowledge at present - but LL100 is.
Welding a bridge in the G's inlet port will certainly improve piston life, but it will also cause extra turbulence, reducing the effective flow area. The con rod is directly behind that bridge alright, but the inlet flow has already expanded by the time it encounters the rod, so the rod is less of an obstacle.
We wanted to avoid welding and the according cylinder distortion, and we wanted to make our own pipes, which became a lot simpler with the reversed cylinder block.
We had to make an airbox for the carbs sitting directly behind the front wheel, but that was no extra work because even if we hadn't reversed the cylinder we would have made an airbox in order to keep the engine from inhaling hot air from the radiator.
And we didn't care about the bike looking original because it wasn't a classic back then. It should win races, never mind the looks. And the best combination proved to be a reversed G cylinder block with 38 mm carbs on RD400 crankcases with their extra case volume. That bike really flew.
Yep Frits, RD400 cases are the go to get some case volume, especially with a TZ400 with reeds added ,made from a stroked Banshee crank
and 66mm Wossner pistons in a 350G cylinder, with 8 transfers.
Because they are period legal as well, 40mm flat slide Lectrons flow way more air than the old round slide Mikunis ever did
I was astounded to find that Yamaha had made the 400 with practically the same side cover fixing as the earlyer 250 based case.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
The actual crankcase cover used from the TZ C model on up until about the H was based on the production RD400 cover pattern. According to the details i have, They previously they used a DS7 cover pattern modified for a water pump in place of the Autolube pump with other changes as required.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Looking at this picture made me wonder again...
Placement and size of the piston windows, anyone with some ideas about the what and the why ?
(in this case they seem small, sometimes they are higher up, these are low etc.)
I've alluded to this before and if I remember correctly Wob stated they are for inlet only (I can imagine they could also be of use on the downstroke in aiding flow to the C-port.)
Ps, love the video's Adegnes!
They are small Ief. Compared to smaller competition two-strokes the TZ750 is not a racing engine at all; it's a tourer. But that was what was needed to do the job.
You can't beat cubes, as the merikans say, but the cubes can beat you, if you let them.
The TZ750 had to be very forgiving, so all port timings were mild and the reeds were barely big enough for a 50 cc racer. We tried to 'correct' this once, putting TZ350-stuff on the TZ750 cases.
Takazumi Katayama rode it, once. The bike had at least 30 hp more than anything else on the track, but it was unrideable. While everybody else could start opening the throttle after mid-corner, Takazumi had to wait till the bike was completely upright, and then he had to concentrate on not flipping over backward.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
That port map of yours doesn't look like the KR1S I worked on. There was no blind gully port and the auxiliary exhaust ports were 2 mm higher than the central exhaust.
And I didn't window the pistons; I replaced them with Yamaha TD2B racing pistons: lighter, one ring instead of two, and 1 mm less compression height which gave me the desired transfer timing without having to do anything to the ports.
Other mods: head inserts to compensate for the lower TDC, raising the central exhaust by 2 mm (which was the maximum that was allowed under the regulations), shortening the inlet rubbers as much as possible (6 mm I think it was) while keeping the standard 28 mm carbs (regulations again) and fitting own pipes. It produced 73 rear wheel-HP; quite enough for the then standard 400-class. 400 cc four-cylinder four-strokes against 250 cc two-stroke twins; let's show them how unfair that is.
adegnes:
Videos look very good. Stay with the rum. Insights come easier.
There are currently 238 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 238 guests)
Bookmarks