Thanks a lot. Interesting stuff.
Thanks a lot. Interesting stuff.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
.
Don't do it ...... or part throttle deto will ensue.
Somewhere TeeZee has a post about the results when he tried that.
Factual Facts are based on real Fact and Universal Truths. Alternative Facts by definition are not based on Truth.
Im thinking I might have to ditch the zeeltronics and go ignitech so I can 1. Control the PV better, 2, buy and RGV TPS so I can make a 3D map. But only if that would help fill the hole, at least at full.
Wob, have you had this issue on CPI barrels to try fill in? Or perhaps your pipes were understandably better suited. Any ideas appreciated.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are three suspects.
1 - how much advance have you got at the rpm where the hole is - with the PV down at that rpm a bunch of advance at part throttle isnt going to detonate.
2 - seeing as the PV fills in the huge hole, I wonder if the blade is down far enough and or is it sitting at more than 0.5mm away from the piston when fully down.Any more than that and its leaking like a sieve and doing jack shit.
3 - The end of the needle may be too thin, as you said you were rolling on to WOT just below the hole. The mixture at WOT when at low rpm is set by the needle/tube annulus area, and this may simply be way too rich
as it hits full throttle.Try rolling on slower so the needle isnt fully up till over 7000,this will show whats going on with the fueling.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
26@5000 down to 24#7000. Was trying to be conservative on pump gas.
Yeah needles do need some more work, what I was running trying to tune around that porous cylinder isn't right now.
I matched the (flat) blades you got made real nice to the first barrel. They aren't as well matched to the current one. Maybe I should readdress that.
Thanks for the ideas.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Er. . no.2. Surely if the PVs were leaking badly. Leaving fuse out holding them down, surely that would have little effect?
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Yeah, so I tried it opening as late as the dip switch modded Yam controller would allow (supposedly 7000 but seems like earlier) and then with it held closed. Closed till almost 8 wins.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Greatly appreciate your experience !
Thinking out loud...- the last of the "normal" TZ250's - I'd forgotten that - wasn't that an odd size piston ? (4A1 ? cylinder) - or maybe thinking of something different...
The banshee +4 crank - I've never been able to find a supplier that lists one that isn't welded - does anyone supply them just pressed up with a separate crankpin ?
I did ask a few of the suppliers a couple of years ago - if they would supply just the wheels - I can put them together myself - but all negative answers...
I'd looked at the Kawasaki pistons a while back too - although in the places I've been looking - can only find pistons for KE175 at 61.5 & the KE175D at 62.5 - although I've a feeling I may have seen KH ? 500 at somewhere around those sizes - not looked recently...
The PV when held down fills in that huge hole, but just maybe if it was to work " better " it would also fix the hole further down.
Re the 250 G cylinder, yes it had an odd bore size 54.4 I think,but using oversize Wossner H1 pistons at 61.5 diameter this isnt relevant ( 58 by 61.5 keeps it under 350 and doesn't need case trenching )
I build cranks for the RD series engines ( using modified Banshee parts ) and only the center pin is welded.These have Mallory added to the wheels so that
the crank can be balanced correctly for the stronger long rods and the pistons that are much heavier than the oem 250 ones the cranks were originally designed for.
They use rollers on the outside, and a 1/2 clip groove is added to the center main tunnel, as all the engines i do have straight cut low ratio primary gears - needed to achieve
the top speeds and keep normal sized sprockets.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Right gotcha. Will try get back to dyno one night and try different throttle techniques to see if it alters. Will try dropping needles and think already on fat shallow taper but have about 3 other options.
Then will try crank some more advanced just to see if it can be used to change that area.
3rd option take it all apart again and rework or remake the blades.
Appreciate it.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
If you can only get to 500* then there is a serious problem.
It can only be a few issues that will cause this, way too much compression or timing for the fuel, or severe short circuiting.
I had the short circuiting problem on a 250 MX engine that had the Aux ground around to bore center.It ran just fine but when the piston was changed from a
Wossner to a Prox it ran like shit and would not respond to leaner jetting changes at all.
Finally in desperation I pulled it down ,to discover that the Wossner had a machined hole in the skirt above the small end that did not go around past the centerline.
The Prox had a huge cast in cutout,that was well past centerline and this was seriously joining the Aux and A transfer together as the piston passed over them.
Changing the piston fixed the jetting issue immediately,where previously it would run rich ( 500* ) no matter what jet was in it.
Any engine on petrol should be able to run past 600* in the header without any problems at all, no matter what the cc,rpm or bmep.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Wobbly, How close do you run your EGT probe to the port? I noticed on both the new KTM 125/250 MX bikes that I could not see EGT's over 1000*F. leaning it out didn't change much on the temp, but once I heard popping on over-rev, I then came back the other way. I did run the probe about 3" from the face of the pipe, so maybe I was too far away from the port face, making the readings a bit low?
There are currently 22 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 21 guests)
Bookmarks