page 1750 links list.
A lot of decade pages have small collections of interesting quotes.
The pages listed below have bigger collections of interesting quotes and useful links.
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...tuner/page1700
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...tuner/page1500
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...tuner/page1000
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...-tuner/page750
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...-tuner/page500
page 1750 links list to go here:- B
![]()
The two basic items needed for adapting a NSR125 or 250 cylinder to the bottom end of your choice to make a go fast water cooled Bucket engine.
Class racing rules for F4 (Buckets) have water cooled two strokes at 100cc with maximum (re bore) oversize at 110cc and two strokes over 104cc are limited to a single 24mm carb or equivalent
De-stroked crank, 48mm stroke for 110cc and 44.5mm for 100cc. Other cylinders like the RGV250, RG250, Aprilia 125 are possibilities too.
Page 1680 has all the detail you might want to know. https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...tuner/page1680
Scratch around and follow the links on page 1680, there is a lot of build information to be found.
Ignition generator details are on page 1681 https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...tuner/page1681
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...post1131047135
Other links to NSR tuning info.
http://nsr-world.com/tuning/250-tuning/engine/
http://thetrxproject.blogspot.co.nz/...e-top-end.html
https://performance-engineering.co.uk/nsr-specialists/
https://performance-engineering.co.u...oke-tuning.php
A Suzuki GP100 fitted with an un-modified NSR250 cylinder is good for 28 rwhp.
page 1750 links list to go here:- C
There are some very knowledgeable people out there that completely disagree with Me, Frits and Jan about the Ex duct cooling principle.
Roland Holzer in his last iteration of the Modena kart engine made the duct alot shorter, saying that this allowed the pipe ( header,spigot ) to heat up faster
when exiting corners.
Franco at TM has a radical new design in CAD that completely insulates the duct from water cooling with an air gap.
I plan on completely disproving the whole hot duct idea ( or making an idiot of myself ) by very soon having a brand new TM cylinder ceramic coated inside the duct.
This coating surface will be VERY hot where in contact with the retained air/fuel charge.
Doing exactly this process on the Britten made a heap of power, and doubled the water boil time when the bike was warmed up ( as the small rad was ducted correctly
for forward motion,not sitting still ).
It will have only one of two results on the 2T - 125 , instant detonation due to overheated gas being pushed back into the cylinder, or the engine will make more power due to
more heat energy being transferred into the pipe.
Just a very small maybe - would be both effects occur simultaneously. But deto kills engines,so that trumps the other effect every time.
The dyno will not lie,as will the deto sensor on the head.
Even if I am wrong I WILL tell everyone the result,as it has caused some very heated ( pun intended ) discussion, with lots of Italian arm waving in the process.
And of course I would REALLY love to finally prove that The Great Leader was talking out his arse about a hotter duct being better - though he sort of already did that with
his Chinese funded fiasco.
Re the GRM crank with add on web plates.
This is exactly what some new R&D idiots did to the Aprilia after Jan retired - sadly for them it suddenly lost a heap of power.
In a reed engine there is a bottom limit to the case volume that sits at around 1.3 in my experience.
The RV engine loves additional volume than that,so removing the plates on the GRM reed,and using Mallory may not work if the case becomes too big.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Mikuni TM24 with horrible manifold bent in two planes, versus Keihin TA26 with straight-line entry square on to reed block.
Which will give the best performance?
Don't know until I get some dyno time, but I'm guessing the TA.
Appears to be from an MVX250 or an NS400, and was donated/loaned by F5Dave, and originally a gift from Yow Ling.
Thank you Dave and Mike.
I have to say, it's a bloody big carb for a 50, only clears the frame by 2mm. Probably the same casting they use for the 36mm carb.
Did you check for dribble at steep angles ? I mocked up my pair the other day and found that even with the tracts dead vertical there seemed to be no weeping from the pilots...I'll be using mine with the top covers pretty well horizontal - so back a bit from full vertical downdraft.
Will be very interesting to hear what it did. Makes me wonder though, whether it's close enough apples to apples, because that coating is an insulator that reflects heat rather than absorbs it, and its thermal mass is very small for whatever it absorbs. So you might actually get hotter exhaust, cooler intake charge in ex duct, as well as cooler bore. Possibly.
So, I'm betting a bottle of Koskenkorva, that you'll make more power, but it's not because hot exhaust duct idea works.😊
I believe that the design allows seepage through the gland between the crankcase and cylinder, it is not totally sealed - the piston being straight line ( not having sidethrust forces ) requires minimal lubrication. (how that works I don't know, but it's not my theory, however I did read that somewhere re: this engine).
Probably, like many glands, they have multiple 'chevron'' type seals and so seal one way but allow seepage the other way.
Here is a link which says that he is a bit cagey about how the piston is lubricated, it might be as I mentioned but it might also have oil fed through small passages inside the piston to the periphery - who knows?
http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12589
Strokers Galore!
Imagine it's a hot day, say 35deg outside. Out in the yard lies a steel crowbar and a wooden handled shovel; they've both been in the sun for hours so they are both around the same temperature. But you just know that the crowbar is going to heat your hands up a hell of a lot more than the wooden shovel handle which won't hurt at all. I think the coating might be like the wooden handle - very hot but with a low thermal mass and a relatively low capacity to transfer that heat.
I should also mention that any work involving a large crowbar is inadvisable regardless of the weather....
That's an interesting question,
How are you going to test this? Under which conditions? Steady state? Dynamic? Laptimes? And which parameters of the engine do you plan to change during the comparison?
I suppose a very well cooled exhaust port transfers about 8 hp more heat into the coolant which should then raise an engine temperature of 40 deg to about 44 deg. So as a starting point, the engine with the well cooled exhaust has a disadvantage of about half a pony or so. The question is then, can you gain more than that by throwing advance and compression at it until the same level of deto is reached? Probably yes, but the engine might need a shorter pipe first. If you can also run leaner this should recover some of the exhaust heat.
Is it really desirable to have the pipe heat up as fast as possible? If the heat up characteristic matches the track and the gearing this could also give an advantage due to a wider dynamic powerband, couldn't it?
The more I think about it, the more parameters come to my mind. This seems like at least a full week of testing if planned and executed thoroughly. I am looking forward to the outcome!
There are currently 201 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 201 guests)
Bookmarks