Page 1776 of 2625 FirstFirst ... 7761276167617261766177417751776177717781786182618762276 ... LastLast
Results 26,626 to 26,640 of 39365

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #26626
    Join Date
    11th April 2012 - 06:07
    Bike
    03 yamaha r6
    Location
    holland
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Vannik View Post
    I thought it a good idea to investigate the size of the piston side thrust force (N) in a normal 125cc engine with different conrod lengths. The attached picture shows those forces for a conventional 125cc engine and in each case the power and combustion pressure was the same. I cannot do this for the Ryger as I do not know the pressure history in the combustion chamber:

    Attachment 331856
    btw does the ryger use variable compression ratio?
    read this somewhere: The engine (1) also includes features for varying the compression ratio so as to increase the engine efficiency
    I dont know if this was mentioned before

  2. #26627
    Join Date
    9th August 2013 - 20:06
    Bike
    kreidler rs 1976
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    85
    Quote Originally Posted by Vannik View Post
    I thought it a good idea to investigate the size of the piston side thrust force (N) in a normal 125cc engine with different conrod lengths. The attached picture shows those forces for a conventional 125cc engine and in each case the power and combustion pressure was the same. I cannot do this for the Ryger as I do not know the pressure history in the combustion chamber:

    Attachment 331856
    Thanks Neels, for your investigation. I wrote that I also used the same burnig pressure.
    In comparing only the conrod, the same pressure is the only good starting point.

  3. #26628
    Join Date
    12th October 2016 - 01:24
    Bike
    1964 Vespa GS
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by WilDun View Post
    I was thinking about the " too short" rod needed to fit inside the lower piston dia ( too short in most peoples eyes) - does that piston need to be round? why couldn't it be a narrow rectangle shape or maybe a similar shape to the pistons used in the V4 four stroke Honda racer (of the eighties)?
    This acting as a crosshead and leaving plenty of room for a longer rod to be accommodated?
    Sealing of the "gland" could still be achieved - after all, if they could seal Wankel rotors against the combustion forces there, then surely in this case it would be a piece of cake!
    - Or is my line of thought too far outside the "square" ?
    a rectangular lower piston shape would give a flat surface to spread the side thrust over.

  4. #26629
    Join Date
    10th February 2005 - 20:25
    Bike
    1944 RE 1
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by OopsClunkThud View Post
    a rectangular lower piston shape would give a flat surface to spread the side thrust over.
    That's what I figured, and at the same time the possibility of being able to fit a longer rod deeper into this piston/crosshead (or whatever it might be called).
    This of course would essentially divide the "pumping chamber" - or is it "crankcase" ?? into two parts and I have no idea how that would affect gas flow etc or how it would tie in with blocking off the exhaust port! - (with all this resonance talk, do they need to block it off ).

    It wouldn't necessarily need to be a flat ended rectangle, It could be a round piston with the sides cut away as much as is necessary to accommodate small end bearing/s ( in the web formed by the flat sides of the "rectangle"). I'm sure the sealing around this shape would be quite achievable.

    To me, the length of the present rod just isn't sensible! - why is it short anyway? - even a 25mm taller engine wouldn't have hurt anything, just look at present day four strokes, the head is as tall (and heavy) as the rest of the engine! Guess it has something to do with making it a conversion based on other engines.

    I haven't sat down to try and work it out however - just a passing suggestion which might be crap and can be ignored. (but perhaps someone might consider it worthwhile to have a look and tell me if and where I'm wrong).
    Strokers Galore!

  5. #26630
    Join Date
    8th February 2007 - 20:42
    Bike
    TZ400
    Location
    tAURANGA
    Posts
    3,885
    The square piston idea isnt necessary as with the guide bush/seal/pushrod within the spacing plate there, is no side thrust on the piston.
    But Luc seems to hint that the short rod makes more power - now from a pure physics standpoint,the short rod dwells at BDC longer then the opposite at TDC.
    So with whatever internal trickery is at work,in this case the 90mm rod must overcome the its natural horrendous angular side forces on the guide bush/rod with a better Delivery Ratio
    for the overall system to make more power.
    Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.

  6. #26631
    Join Date
    12th October 2016 - 01:24
    Bike
    1964 Vespa GS
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    101
    from a packaging perspective the one thing I like about the concept is the prospect a 90° V with shared crank journals (even retrofit to 4T). now just add a bit of turbo to bring back the primary pumping efficiency...

  7. #26632
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    20,500
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by OopsClunkThud View Post
    . . . . now just add a bit of turbo to bring back the primary pumping efficiency...
    Oops. There goes your packaging, erm. . , package.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  8. #26633
    Join Date
    12th March 2010 - 16:56
    Bike
    TT500 F9 Kawasaki EFI
    Location
    Hamilton New Zealand
    Posts
    2,764
    Ok Luc, seeing as you are here, let's discuss something you can talk about. The FOS type cylinder concept, can you point out to us why your setup didn't work? You certainly did give this concept a good go by building a working prototype but what happened? Why did you give up on it?

  9. #26634
    Join Date
    10th February 2005 - 20:25
    Bike
    1944 RE 1
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    The square piston idea isnt necessary as with the guide bush/seal/pushrod within the spacing plate there, is no side thrust on the piston.
    But Luc seems to hint that the short rod makes more power - now from a pure physics standpoint,the short rod dwells at BDC longer then the opposite at TDC.
    So with whatever internal trickery is at work,in this case the 90mm rod must overcome the its natural horrendous angular side forces on the guide bush/rod with a better Delivery Ratio
    for the overall system to make more power.
    Thanks Wobbly, I do realize I'm not up with the play and maybe not quite grasping the theory of the thing - be patient with me, you'll get there ...... I am talking about the lower part of the piston (ie small dia part of the piston / piston rod / crosshead or something) - an integral crosshead really, being roughly rectangular - and not necessarily flat ended, basically the whole piston would be roughly the shape ( possibly longer and slimmer across the flats in the skirt) of the old slipper type pistons used in Manx Nortons etc. This odd shaped "rod"/ piston skirt being sealed by an equally odd shaped seal in the plate of course.

    However, the apparent theory behind the short rod blows all that out of the water! but I must say that those horrendous side forces still have to be taken up by something, which means friction (and equally horrendous wear) - I need to wind myself up slowly and get to understand all this stuff which I have not paid a lot of attention to previously!
    Strokers Galore!

  10. #26635
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,823
    Quote Originally Posted by WilDun View Post
    That's what I figured, and at the same time the possibility of being able to fit a longer rod deeper into this piston/crosshead (or whatever it might be called).
    This of course would essentially divide the "pumping chamber" - or is it "crankcase" ?? into two parts and I have no idea how that would affect gas flow etc or how it would tie in with blocking off the exhaust port! - (with all this resonance talk, do they need to block it off ).

    It wouldn't necessarily need to be a flat ended rectangle, It could be a round piston with the sides cut away as much as is necessary to accommodate small end bearing/s ( in the web formed by the flat sides of the "rectangle"). I'm sure the sealing around this shape would be quite achievable.

    To me, the length of the present rod just isn't sensible! - why is it short anyway? - even a 25mm taller engine wouldn't have hurt anything, just look at present day four strokes, the head is as tall (and heavy) as the rest of the engine! Guess it has something to do with making it a conversion based on other engines.

    I haven't sat down to try and work it out however - just a passing suggestion which might be crap and can be ignored. (but perhaps someone might consider it worthwhile to have a look and tell me if and where I'm wrong).
    The square piston is so 1970's
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  11. #26636
    Join Date
    9th August 2013 - 20:06
    Bike
    kreidler rs 1976
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    85
    Quote Originally Posted by Flettner View Post
    Ok Luc, seeing as you are here, let's discuss something you can talk about. The FOS type cylinder concept, can you point out to us why your setup didn't work? You certainly did give this concept a good go by building a working prototype but what happened? Why did you give up on it?
    All information about FST-twostroke-design https://www.facebook.com/notes/luc-f.../4080202582494

  12. #26637
    Join Date
    30th April 2011 - 04:57
    Bike
    bsa. honda. aprilia
    Location
    england
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by Vannik View Post
    I thought it a good idea to investigate the size of the piston side thrust force (N) in a normal 125cc engine with different conrod lengths. The attached picture shows those forces for a conventional 125cc engine and in each case the power and combustion pressure was the same. I cannot do this for the Ryger as I do not know the pressure history in the combustion chamber:

    Attachment 331856
    how about an engine with a 38mm piston and 54mm stroke and 90mm conrod length.? isnt the lower part of this rygers piston where the most piston thrust would occur? could the high pressure oil supply to the oil hole in between the piston rings help centralies the upper piston within the cylinder reducing any piston thrust force?

  13. #26638
    Join Date
    18th July 2015 - 16:21
    Bike
    2015 Avanti
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    177
    LucF, did you ever try a liner with the exhaust ports coming out of the liner being inclined 20 to 25 deg, and the transfer passages also inclined at the 15 to 20deg ? The Paw engine company made some small changes to their cutters making the liner back in 08, and gave a 5k performance improvement. So from 15 k to 21,500 rpm from a small geometry change to their radial port engine that was designed and made since the late 1960's.
    Neil

  14. #26639
    Join Date
    9th August 2013 - 20:06
    Bike
    kreidler rs 1976
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    85
    Quote Originally Posted by Lightbulb View Post
    LucF, did you ever try a liner with the exhaust ports coming out of the liner being inclined 20 to 25 deg, and the transfer passages also inclined at the 15 to 20deg ? The Paw engine company made some small changes to their cutters making the liner back in 08, and gave a 5k performance improvement. So from 15 k to 21,500 rpm from a small geometry change to their radial port engine that was designed and made since the late 1960's.
    Neil
    Yes Neil, we tried several portangles.
    We still can change to the old concept of 70hp at 17.500rpm and max rpm of 30k.
    But we don't want to sell an engine which runs to easy to 30k.
    That we will leave that to anyone who want it.
    This is the current Ryger https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJbxxdzhESA

  15. #26640
    Join Date
    16th January 2016 - 04:20
    Bike
    1984 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by lucf View Post
    Yes Neil, we tried several portangles.
    We still can change to the old concept of 70hp at 17.500rpm and max rpm of 30k.
    But we don't want to sell an engine which runs to easy to 30k.
    That we will leave that to anyone who want it.
    This is the current Ryger https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJbxxdzhESA
    The way you put it makes it sound like the max RPM can't be limited with the ignition. Am I right? Very interesting if that's true.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 133 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 132 guests)

  1. Wos

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •