Both NSR 110 and Apr.RSA zero download![]()
Both NSR 110 and Apr.RSA zero download![]()
Ok ... I installed the latest EngMod2T (May) updates Neels had sent out and I also made sure the "un ziped pack file" went into the "C" drive "2Stroke" directory before I tried to unpack it with Dat2T.
It looks like the unpack option is going to work for me now, so will run a simulation.
Yep, that worked, thanks Wob.
Now to have a good look through it to understand what you did and how it improved my original simulation then figure out how to convert it to cut metal.
Frits, you once wrote :
I bellieve it was on pitlane.The total angle.area of the transfers divided by the total scavenged volume per cylinder (cubic capacity plus combustion volume) determines at which rpm the engine starts running out of breath. Revving it much higher does not make much sense
but I don't realy understand as mathematicaly this can't be true : the units are mm2 devided by mm3 ?
for the RSA : Tr A.A = 110315 , SV = 124.8, CCV = 8.6 110315/(124.8+8.6) = 828 ??
Hello
http://www.underdogsracing.com/fospipe/
Seems not working. It is sometimes usefull for me to give a first insight.
Are there other links with the same thing?
Maybe it's time for me to build my calculator?
Cheers
Jan, the unit for angle.area is not mm² but °mm². It's all in the name: angle, multiplied by area. And if you take rpm into consideration, the angle.area becomes a time.area.
Below is that part of Pit-Lane once more, plus another couple of links. There is more to be found on the subject; you'll just have to find the time to search for it.
http://www.pit-lane.biz/t3173p543-gp...-part-2-locked
http://www.pit-lane.biz/t4072p578-gp...-part-3-locked
![]()
I know where it comes from Frits, I copy all interesting stuff people like you say into files like "cylinders" , "Heads" or "Pipes". that's where I copied it from
So I guess now it was just a reverse of the STA formula ? I thought you were pointing to a way of knowing the max (over)rev before power would drop significantly, but ofcourse the torque drops anyway after it has reached it's max. must ....read ... better ...![]()
or you can use mine : http://users.telenet.be/jannemie/FOS...E%20black.xlsm
And a lot of stuff you wouldn't have thought worth testing.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Friday night musical interlude.
When Kate starts singing you realise she was wasted with that other band.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
hey guys maybe one of you clever buggers can say what you think of my idea to allow more fuel to pass through this float valve. ive drilled it out to 3.6mm which is about as big as it can be and still allow to needle to plug the hole. If the fuel has to go through a 3.6mm diam hole that is 2.75 long, what if I grinded it like a funnel so the fuel only has to pass through a 3.6mm hole for say .5mm. does this sound like it could let more fuel through ? I would just try it and see but maybe someone has already tried it and knows the answer. first photo is how it is now. second photo is my idea what I could do
If you want to pass an actual gas through there then the idea has merit. Petrol however isn't so compressible.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Peewee, both Keihin and Dellorto and Amal make float valves withe 4.2 and or 4.5 hole size.
Might be easyer to adapt one with no mods.
I have tried drilling / reaming them before, and could not get them to ever seal again.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
What about using a kart diaphragm/pulse pump and leaving the float valve as close to STD.
PS I would be checking the flow rate out of the tank as well.
http://www.mikunioz.com/shop/df62-70...h-dual-outlet/
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
There are currently 24 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 23 guests)
Bookmarks