https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/a...3&d=1533200780
Looks like the big bang was designed to have zero piston acceleration on the bottom cylinder while the top cylinder was on max deceleration (TDC), poss. 50% primary on the crank wheel married to 50% on the balancer ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I agree with the first bit but not the second.
MY take is the two lots of 50% are the balance factor on each crankshaft, ie half from the opposing piston and half from the counterweight .to achieve 100% primary balance
the balance shaft is for secondary forces, it was added for the two up crank 180 degree crank used the last two years before the big bang. Its main function is the jack-shaft to change the direction of the engine to lessen gyro.
If my theory is correct I dont believe the big bang even really needed it.
Ducati twins have V-angle 90 degrees. This uniquely makes it possible to balance a 90-degree twin with counterweights of 100 percent of one piston’s shaking force. Here’s how it works. At the front cylinder’s TDC and BDC, the heavy crank counterweights cancel the front piston’s shaking force. But at 90 degrees and 270 degrees, those same heavy counterweights now cancel the TDC and BDC shaking force of the rear piston. In other words, both primary piston shaking forces are 100 percent balanced,![]()
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Bartol also STOLE the fairing models from DERBI, and used them on the KTM.
They were made for DERBI by Porsche.
And of course paid for by DERBI.
Later, while testing the RSA engine in 1996 it was discovered that this fairing had a very negative effect
on steering, especially at high speeds!!!
Only good in a straight line...…The bike only wanted to go straight....
Shame on Porsche!!!
And Yamaha also copied the Honda cylinders on the 500/4's, helped by Bartol.
As did Yamaha-France for their 250's.
Yamaha even published an SAE paper about this....
Really SHAMEFUL!
Maybe Honda, just like Aprilia, liked to SELL a lot of pistons.
At Aprilia this was bringing in lots of cash----
80% gains on the price, or more!
Only few people knew this.....
We are saying the same thing..
At the risk of the blind leading the blind (kinematics are my weakest topic) here's a theory.
Using the formula I stated earlier (2xAv)-180) the 112* comes out spot on at 44* pin offset.
That means primary balance is achieved right there, as noted by the zero piston accleration on the bottom cylinder and max decel on the top cylinder (TDC)
The fly in your soup is the secondary forces are having a party in a wasps nest and buzzing away merrily.
I've modded the pic and added the sum of inertia force lines of the secondary in yellow.
Now it seems Honda has approached this problem (likely 2 mins on the back of a cigarette packet for them) by reduced the crank balance factor to 50% and added that other 50% to the balancer so maintaining primary balance. This has allowed them to use a good % of the rotating interia of the balancer counter weight (thats counter-rotating) to offset a fair degree of that untamed secondary inertia force.
The counter force angles are not absolutely in-line while at their respective peaks, but it looks like the level of vibratory forces is reduced to the point that its ok to solidly mount the crankcase into the frame.
Loads of RGV500 pics
including inside the crankcases
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/a...p?albumid=4848
![]()
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
All is very interesting, thanks.
Looks like RGV 500 piston skirt cut at C is big like on street RGV 250 and at the same level like main side cuts. Street RGV 250 piston skirt looks very fragile, but is it made for better flow acceleration through C port, when piston at TDC , or for less obstructed way in/out crankcase when piston at BDC.
Add RGV 500 XR78 1989 cylinder drawing, and probably this was first decade when was discovered that A higher than B work in good way for wider power range, but really I don't know. Ex duct with small step and then two sections before pipe.
Looks like on Honda RSW 250 2009 cylinder duct and spigot dimension gradually changed before pipe without step.
NSR 500 crank-sprocket chain.
The steps and contracting exhaust ducts; could it be that they help such that the exhaust gas does not heat up the duct walls as much. The flow get's separated from the walls after the step? The air-fuel slug going out in the exhaust port will be less heated up? (As the exhaust port opens there is a lot of tubulence and pressure which enhances forced convective heat transfer a lot)
There are currently 25 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 25 guests)
Bookmarks