Frits, Honda CRF250 and CRF450 2017-18. OEM titanium stamped gas tanks. They're pretty!
I need some advice please. Below are photos of my 50's exhaust port as stock. The narrow point at 13 to 15 mm from window centre is only 75% of the window area after downdraft correction.
Should I expand this by raising the roof and/or lowering the floor, or is it serving a useful purpose by accelerating the exhaust stream? The downdraft angle is 25Ί at the top of the port, 4Ί at the bottom.
I can increase the window area some, which will make this restriction worse relative to the window area.
![]()
The best duct geometry for a low bmep single port is to have around 90% area at the face of the cylinder exit.
Then a transition in the spigot out to 100% that is then the header area.
For high bmep 3 port setups the exit area drops to 75% , I demonstrated the effectiveness of this not long ago with a dyno sheet on here , with the biggest power increase I have seen
in all my hundreds of dyno runs of the 125 kart engines.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Thanks Wobbly. I plan to fit an insert to achieve that 90% at 1.5 x bore, and the expansion back out to 100% at 2 x bore, as you have advised.
My question was more about the effect of the 75% restriction that occurs quite close to the port window. I would have thought that a consistent steady reduction from port to 90% is ideal, rather than a wildly varying CSA.
I can probably achieve that, but I'm just wondering if raising the roof and lowering the floor at the tight point is going to have a negative effect. You have written many times about the "ski slope" and it's beneficial effects.
Yes, the combination of a 25* downslope roof and a ski jump floor that has a gradual area reduction is for sure the go.
But this is mainly directed at reducing the CSA of the duct where the Aux ports blend into it .
Here is a cross section of the cylinder I modified to incorporate the side duct ears and the 75% area at the exit.
The roof starts at 25* then flattens out , and the floor slopes away more past the side duct entry area.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
I used to do 82% on single exhaust ports. Basically a mild bridge port shape. Works well and doesn't ear rings. But bottom of port needs to be around 68%.
I always used 75 on the RG50, just be careful chamfering.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Wobb can you tell me more about this situation
Thanks
Early HRC
BSL500 in Cycleworld
Kawa X09 at Daytona (i added the pics to fill in space although the cut off one i think is Aaron Slight judging by the leathers Team Moving)
The deisgn never made decent power with it breating through the bottom of the cases
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rYf6KffxOG...0/001-Copy.jpg
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Fletto, congratulations on the near completion of your creation of the symmetrical circumcision device. Well done, although a question:
Can you, without the introduction of a second servo or a manual belt shift, vary the opening gap to be advanced ar retarded from the shown mid position?
DANGER WARNING: you kiwis should be very aware of such a gizmo cos it does get so cold over there![]()
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm.
it may not be readily apparent but the tooth belt drive has different numbers of teeth for each Gib. So opening gib moves less than the trailing gib.
This linked belt is just to get the project up and running, ulitamtely both ( or at least one) Gib will be servo driven.
Gib opening will be throttle, Gib positioning will be decided by ECU for best timing for given rpm and other inputs.
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Bookmarks