No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
DEA use a pulsed flow bench, that effectively recreates the actual flow regime in the transfers .
This gives a much more accurate representation of reality and can be used reliably to predict power.
I met Yamaha's GP technical director in 2000 and he said that that they had just reached the stage where using the CNC Czech flow visualizer
they could accurately predict the power by being able to see and analyse the trapping and scavenging efficiency of the ports in a cylinder.
They had used it to develop the 250 ( title winning twin ) after years of not being even close in Hp , though that was also in part due to finally ditching the stupid oversquare bore size.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Yamaha won the title because Guy Coulon, tech 3's chief mechanic, made copies of the Honda cylinders for their Yamaha's, without Czech flow visualizer. They also used a copy of the Aprilia fairing, offered to them by an ex-Aprilia aerodynamicist. We had such a Czech flow visualizer at Aprilia, it proved to be completely useless. DEA made his own, I don't know of any results.. The best pulsed flowbench is the engine itself....
That´s exactly what my own logic says to me.
One cannot copy real world scenarios.
Pressure oscillation in crankhouse.
Backpressure from exhaust varies.
Piston moves and disturbes flow.
The ports are fully open on a fraction of a second.
And so on and so on.
I would say that an electrical engine that pulls the engine to test at different rpm´s, whole cranksystem with piston etc etc is about as close as you can get if you measure the air pumped through the cylinder.
But when adding spark,fuel and a pipe, all is changing as there comes a lot of new variables in the game.
So, dyno is by far the best.
The racetrack is the ultimate tool, the dyno being the second most representative. However there are lots of other tools eg EngMod, Frit’s FOS exhaust formula, Jante rigs, Gordon Blair’s CO2 single cycle rig, empirical guides for port areas, etc, etc. If DEA have success with their rig then for them they have a good tool to shorten dev’t costs and time…
Importantly, 2 hours and Jack Miller is off from P2…can’t wait.![]()
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm.”
Yes he will. And it's true that TM has a firm grip on the 125 cc shifter kart market, although DEA has a beautiful KZ125 engine; the only one in its class with a balance shaft and a coolant pump, while all other engines rely on a rear axle-driven pump that does nothing for engine cooling when you are gassing it on the start line.
![]()
What I can see in sim is that if you are flowing at higher speeds you can see that the smaller transfer is picking up speed further down in the transfer because of it seems to have a less tendency to choke as we approach the transfer port . You can begin to see it after about 0.0008 sec. On the left incompressible, right compressible, up speed and down pressure / density. If this would have any effect in reality then it should start to be clear after 10000 rpm
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
There are currently 47 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 46 guests)
Bookmarks