The effect that having an efficiently working squish ( up at 38M/s ) is to increase the turbulence of the compressing mixture, around TDC.
This increases burn speed thru the chamber and is all but exactly the same as adding static advance.
This can be offset at higher rpm by retarding the timing in this area , to get heat back in the pipe.
Retarding the whole curve by just moving the stator is not effective as this reduces the additional midrange Hp advantage gained.
Adding flywheel inertia ( not just mass ) will increase overev capability ,up to a point , then simple physics dictates that it takes too much additional energy to accelerate
that increased rotational inertia and Hp suffers as a result.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
I got it sorted, thanks it was my own dumb fault. The software is awesome, I am using an evaluation copy at the moment but I will be buying t when the month is over. It took a while to get started and to figure it out but now that I am making headway I can see the weak area in my engine and I can work on that to improve. The great thing is I can move other stuff around to try and bring them all into balance. No point having a massive power potential in one when you cant use it because of another bottle neck.
Im not so sure on the suggested carb size as I have found good low end gains by going larger. But the rest seems to be very good. I have not yet got into the wave diagrams every one posts up here
Hey i have put my engine into engmod.
It seems i have a massive issue with the exhaust port but i can fix that. I think.
anyway to get my transfers to flow anywhere close to what im after i have to put them at 130 degrees of open time.
My sta for the blow down is still more than the transfers flow. it seems high to run the transfers, should i still just go for it ??
Wobbly - As Mr. Box put it, "Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful." I'm not doubting your methodology and test results, in fact I believe those more than a model. I'm just trying to understand if the model was reflecting what you've found throughout the years. Maybe there are benefits the model doesn't account for? I'm not really sure what factors go into EngMod, besides TUbMax, octane, etc., when predicting detonation. You've mentioned with tight squish, approaching zero, there isn't any mixture left to detonate. If TUbMax approaches critical detonation temperature, but there's nothing, or very very little, left in the squish maybe detonation doesn't happen in real life? Perhaps Neels can comment on the detonation prediction for a special case of near-zero squish.
i havent any idea what cylinder youve got but you might try widening them before raising them to the clouds. right now im in the process of doing just that, so the B can farther around back. of course these shitters have no excess material to work with so i have to cut open the water jacket and weld. finished welding couple days ago and just need to cap the holes. photo is after cutting the windows but before any welding
I've always wondered why the OEM's would run 2mm of squish clearance on they're motors?
Last generation of Honda CR 250R motocross single cylinder was notorious for this.
What was their reasoning?
Production tolerences, they have to allow for the worst combination of parts
cylinder length
conrod length
piston height
gasket thickness. etc
if you add in the tallestest and thickest of these parts what was set at 1mm can become 0.0mm rather quick.
pistons and big ends and crankpins are coded in dia size to accommodate production variance but not in length.
As it was the last models Honda likely also got sloppier than normal.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
I used to think that too, Husa.
But 2mm! I've checked the squish on many of these stock, and they're all the same. I don't think it's production tolerance they were after
Has anyone tried port filling with map gas and aluminum brazing rod?
I used to believe Graham Bell's explanation (1st testament, the bit people have to take with a grain of salt.. . .still waiting for 2nd. Just throwing it out there). But without exception every bike I've checked if any got slightly near a reasonable squish through these means (tolerance stack up), the compression ratio would cause a string of detonation warranty claims that didn't go away with new parts.
My GasGas 300 for example cut to a safe 1mm was edging towards 17:1. You have to twist thick solder together to get a measurement as its well over 2mm.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
few yrs ago before i bought a welder i tried the braze rod and map gas on some scrap cylinders. im no professional with that stuff but its not very suitable for engine stuff, other than maybe plugging a casting pinhole on the exterior, but epoxy could plug the hole just as easy and be cheaper and less hassle
when doing build up, which is near impossible, the previous layer of rod will melt off like solder when trying to apply a top layer. its weird stuff and a pain in the neck imo. also it doesnt fuse into the parent material like a weld does either. seems like ive got some still laying around if you want it but for god sakes just dont try sending it back to me![]()
.
.
I have finally got the simulator working and the modified Speeduino code that reads the MAP sensor working properly.
I now have a fuel injection system that measures the high and low pressures in a two strokes crankcase and displays the difference as a valid MAP reading that the Speeduino can use in its other tables. Currently no other fuel injection system uses this approach.
The next step is to get the Speeduino hardware installed on the bike and give it a twirl on the dyno to see if we have got rid of that pesky problem with coming back on the throttle again after shutting off from a WOT run. This throttle response problem has been what has defeated previous attempts by many people who have tried their hand at fuel injecting high performance two strokes. If my idea of using the difference between high and low crankcase pressure as a MAP value works. It will be as far as I know the worlds first ever publicly accessible EFI firmware that works for high performance two strokes that run above 10,000rpm and make more than 10bar BMEP by heavily relying on their pipe resonance for making power.
The MAP value varies depending on the difference between the High and Low pressures in the 2S crankcase. Close the throttle and the difference is less and the MAP value is lower. Open the throttle and the difference increases and the MAP value goes up. Just like it does with a 4T.
.
There are currently 46 users browsing this thread. (3 members and 43 guests)
Bookmarks