Page 2248 of 2629 FirstFirst ... 1248174821482198223822462247224822492250225822982348 ... LastLast
Results 33,706 to 33,720 of 39427

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #33706
    Join Date
    22nd November 2013 - 16:32
    Bike
    STRIKE trike & KTM300 EXC TPI
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    879
    UHV 5

    In some respects I wasn’t completely excited with the engine performance, so wanted to do 2 things before I progressed any further.

    The first thing was the cylinder. It was something left over that was junked for one reason being a hole through the bore to the outside world. I did fill this with Devcon, but as you can see that this wasn’t lasting and was externally seeping. So, created a new liner (we fortunately had some spare blanks kicking around) with exh and inlet ports only.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Leaking plugged bore.jpg 
Views:	140 
Size:	199.0 KB 
ID:	345716

    The other thing was the nature of the flow coming from the 3 petals. Are we getting a nice pancake mixture descending slug or is it some high velocity swirl motion around the outside of the bore, perhaps not displacing the centre exhaust gases?

    So, with a bit of 3D printing made up the rig in the vid so one could see the valve movement and also maybe get an idea of the gas motion.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iceFOIRa6Fw&t=8s

    The problem with bloody 2 strokes is that, when “off the pipe”, there is always exhaust gas remaining in the cylinder. The scavenging streams are intended to both displace this as much as possible out the exhaust, and not itself escape out the exhaust and also, remain stratified enough to ensure there is a combustible mixture at the plug. Each and every cycle = a 2 stroke that 2 strokes.

    So, the plan is to observe the 3 petal flow plus try some other alternatives that I have ready to go.

    In some respect it could be treated like a Jante rig, but I don’t think that this is a great system. Interestingly the Jante rigs I have seen used a fixed piston and air being blown thru the crankcase, whereas in this case, the flow will be derived from a motored engine.

    More to come.
    "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm.”

  2. #33707
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,479
    Quote Originally Posted by mr bucketracer View Post
    hey tz . What did the port timing of your stort stroke bucket engine end up been .just building my one
    Shortened Suzuki crank to 48mm stroke and NSR250 54mm bore cylinder. Packed up the barrel to get transfers opening 116 deg ATDC and that positioned the exhaust opening at 80 deg ATDC without any additional porting required.

    The shorter 48mm stroke has the effect of increasing the blow down time area on the NSR cylinder that originally had a 54mm stroke. As the short stroke crank needs to turn a lot more degrees to get between Ex opening and Trans opening.

    We did this conversion with a basically stock Suzuki GP100. A little later closing on the Rotary valve (80 deg ATDC). Used the original Suzuki GP carb and inlet tract. Honda RS125 NF4 pipe. Made a strong 25 RWHP. With another engine (my EFI bike) and a lot more work (and much more crankcase volume) we have managed a good 30 RWHP.

  3. #33708
    Join Date
    8th December 2014 - 14:39
    Bike
    1980 Suzuki Gs1100E
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    146
    Hello everyone:
    This question is not necessarily related to two stroke or four stroke but to dyno building. If this is not the right place please move it. I was looking at the post that Frits put up with the picture of the bike on a dyno and I noticed in the background was a second roller and shaft up against the wall and it looked different then the one on the dyno. I thought it looked a little smaller in width. And I thought, how does a person know what MOI to design into a roller for a certain size bike like a 125cc MX or a 250 roadracer or a 50cc moped or a 1100cc road bike? I have a inertia dyno with a 355mm dia and 406mm length. How can I figure out what size bike this was designed for and how much weight to add for a bigger size bike or different application.

  4. #33709
    Join Date
    20th April 2011 - 08:45
    Bike
    none
    Location
    Raalte, Netherlands
    Posts
    3,342
    Quote Originally Posted by jfn2 View Post
    how does a person know what MOI to design into a roller for a certain size bike like a 125cc MX or a 250 roadracer or a 50cc moped or a 1100cc road bike? I have a inertia dyno with a 355mm dia and 406mm length. How can I figure out what size bike this was designed for and how much weight to add for a bigger size bike or different application.
    You do not need to change the inertia; adjust the gearing so that the bike on the dyno goes through its power band in the same time as it would do on the track.
    That is the nice thing about inertia dynos; they allow you to develop an engine for the exact circumstances that it has to perform in.

  5. #33710
    Join Date
    8th December 2014 - 14:39
    Bike
    1980 Suzuki Gs1100E
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    146
    Frits
    Thank you very much for the response.

  6. #33711
    Join Date
    3rd January 2012 - 01:25
    Bike
    -
    Location
    -
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by jfn2 View Post
    Hello everyone:
    This question is not necessarily related to two stroke or four stroke but to dyno building. If this is not the right place please move it. I was looking at the post that Frits put up with the picture of the bike on a dyno and I noticed in the background was a second roller and shaft up against the wall and it looked different then the one on the dyno. I thought it looked a little smaller in width. And I thought, how does a person know what MOI to design into a roller for a certain size bike like a 125cc MX or a 250 roadracer or a 50cc moped or a 1100cc road bike? I have a inertia dyno with a 355mm dia and 406mm length. How can I figure out what size bike this was designed for and how much weight to add for a bigger size bike or different application.
    If I remember correctly, when the roller weight is double that of the bike+rider, then the acceleration time will be like on the road for every gear.

    You can find further info and a nice excel spreadsheet on roller design on the sportdevices homepage

  7. #33712
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,479
    Quote Originally Posted by mr bucketracer View Post
    Thanks for that . Mines even shorter stroke again but good to see ratio difference From standard Nsr to yours . Just need to find that now
    Suzuki GP125 Bore 56mm stroke 50mm ratio 1.12: 1

    NSR MC21 Bore 54 stroke 54 ratio 1:1

    De stroked Suzuki GP with NSR cylinder Bore 54mm stroke 48mm ratio 1.12:1

    So these 110cc hybrid engines have the same bore/stroke ratio as the original Suzuki GP's. Which was not ideal but worked well enough.

  8. #33713
    Join Date
    2nd July 2013 - 11:52
    Bike
    GPR150
    Location
    palmertson north
    Posts
    2,389
    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    Suzuki GP125 Bore 56mm stroke 50mm ratio 1.12: 1

    NSR MC21 Bore 54 stroke 54 ratio 1:1

    De stroked Suzuki GP with NSR cylinder Bore 54mm stroke 48mm ratio 1.12:1

    So these 110cc hybrid engines have the same bore/stroke ratio as the original Suzuki GP's. Which was not ideal but worked well enough.
    mines 44.8 stroke and 56mm bore . Cr80 is 45mm stroke . As a starting point I will set the exhaust at the same hight as a cr80 and go from there . Just will keep machining the head to drop in the barrel as I lift the barrel
    i'm over buckets

  9. #33714
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,479
    Quote Originally Posted by mr bucketracer View Post
    mines 44.8 stroke and 56mm bore . Cr80 is 45mm stroke. Just will keep machining the head to drop in the barrel as I lift the barrel
    My guess is you are going to use a RGV250 twin cylinder or better yet a 30hp std Aprilia RS125 road bike cylinder with reed valves. That would be my choice. I could not de stroke far enough for 44.8mm. I would have had to sleeve the pin boss and re bore it. That was beyond me so I take my hat of to you.

  10. #33715
    Join Date
    13th May 2011 - 15:09
    Bike
    98 honda 125
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by 190mech View Post
    Sorry Will,Looks like Rotax is still using a stupid expansion chamber with their Turbo engine!!WTF??
    Stupid expansion chamber? Could you explain?

  11. #33716
    Join Date
    2nd July 2013 - 11:52
    Bike
    GPR150
    Location
    palmertson north
    Posts
    2,389
    Thanks tz . It has a rgv barrel on it but have a tzr to try and also a hole aprilia engine which I may short stroke and build a frame for as the drive is on the other side. Not really my thing as a true bucket engine but is within the rules . Guess I need all the help I can get lol
    i'm over buckets

  12. #33717
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    20,556
    Blog Entries
    2
    What we really need is an early Mito. Only because it has 7 gears which seems impossibly exotic (but in reality is just another gear).
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  13. #33718
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,479
    Quote Originally Posted by mr bucketracer View Post
    Aprilia engine which I may short stroke and build a frame for as the drive is on the other side. Not really my thing as a true bucket engine but is within the rules .
    Yes. we took a good look at an Aprilia engine but back then we could not de stroke the crank. Otherwise we would have used it for sure.

  14. #33719
    Join Date
    19th June 2011 - 00:29
    Bike
    KR-1S, KR1-SV, KXR500, ZXR 4/600
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by Myron View Post
    Stupid expansion chamber? Could you explain?
    I agree with your question mark.

    I don't think I'd be still interested in a 2-stroke without an expansion chamber, even if a turbo would make it a better engine.

    The moment the pipe begins to sing is THE haleluya-moment of riding bikes. and I hate flat torque-curves, they make bike-riding boring.

  15. #33720
    Join Date
    10th February 2005 - 20:25
    Bike
    1944 RE 1
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by JanBros View Post
    I agree with your question mark.

    I don't think I'd be still interested in a 2-stroke without an expansion chamber, even if a turbo would make it a better engine.

    The moment the pipe begins to sing is THE haleluya-moment of riding bikes. and I hate flat torque-curves, they make bike-riding boring.
    But you haven't heard one with a turbo, when you do, then you can decide which is better!
    Strokers Galore!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 140 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 140 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •