How is the load from the new springs applied to the hub?
How is the load from the new springs applied to the hub?
Thanks
It actually didn´t raise the force needed in hand that very much, i though if it happened i´ll make it hydraulic also
Thanks for the link of the oil, it might be needed
It did a fast test today, no full pull in dyno as it was late in the evening, it seems promising, now the tire broke loose instead.
You need to think again
The stainless disc is the 'wall' the springs rests at, both oem and the added, this is locked to the hub with the four countersinked screws..
Then there are cups that are oem and added cups that holds the springs.
The same function as oem, just no screws inside them, almost like zundapp´s clutch, just the other way around.
https://www.google.com/search?q=clut...w=1440&bih=754
I was thinking again, and you have a gap between the pressure plate and your new plate. I like it.
Hi jfn2
Such radius with unmatched head may cause detonation if the other settings (ignition, compression, squish height and width) are selected correctly.
It is not difficult task to change head shape, for rounded crown piston without sharp part at C. But some playing with ignition timing will be needed. Maybe slightly retard.
Made a couple of pulls today, this is the best one.
White line is dyno roller, Yellow is engine rpm, they should follow eachother.
Clutch managed to transfer 37.21Nm while slipping.
Weather was really moisture today, almost 74%
I also pulled a couple of degrees ignition from it today, wanted to run safe while searching for problems with the clutch, this to also make the torque to come in smoother.
Brett S:
Yes, if you look at the pics you'll see the ring pin was installed horizontally and the pin dia is slightly larger than the ring land.
Katinas:
If you look at these new pics you'll see I have no detno, in fact I think I'm a little rich, and the timing is stock. Although right off hand I don't know what that is. But I will be keeping an eye on it in the future. I would have to look but I think my squish is .85mm. And yes I know that my exhaust port bridge is not quite recessed enough. Since I can not do anything about the rounding on this piston it will have to do and I will work on the head rounding. I will leave you know what I come up with.
jfn2,
It looks to me like the anti rotation pin hole is on centre with the ring groove. This means that there is a leakage path around the back of the ring and outwards underneath the ring. Bad.
The drilling and pin should always be above the bottom of the ring groove. See pic. The small darkness under the pin is just a reflection of the pin.
![]()
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm.”
Yes , the ring pin from Wiseco has a leakage path on the ring land bottom seal face - dumb.
Now I must admit I never understood the need to have engine rpm on the Y scale , makes perfect sense when you compare the dead straight roller speed delta to the engine rpm to see any slip.
But there is also the possibility to plot slip % as a calculated chanel , but shit , never needed normaly as you can hear a slipping clutch immediately.
The other thing that i found with radiused piston timing edges is that the rule of thumb is to drop the cylinder by 1/2 the radius ie 1mm rad = 0.5 drop.
Then the advantage of the radius alone is seen on the dyno - a good increase all the way up the front side power , but a drop in overev.
But going the extra mile of hard work and stopping the radius each side of the boost port , and power increases everywhere.
Of course the head has to be radiused as well , or the base deto level increases dramatically. - thus lowering the available leeway when tuning to the edge.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Agreed. You can easily play it by ear if engine rpm suddenly starts rising at twice the rate. But clutches have more tricks up their sleeves, like creeping; say during 30° of each crankshaft revolution, i.e. about 10° per clutch revolution. That is not so obvious to the ear, but it would mean a 8% power loss. Which would heat the clutch, which.... etc. Power can sometimes be found by working on a clutch that didn't audibly slip.
I have had that scenario. I'd increased the plate area but accidentally decreased the spring tension not noticing different models had different springs from my stash.
It acted as a power regulator. Wouldn't get past a certain power level.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are currently 42 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 41 guests)
Bookmarks