B port short side radius below BDC on these 1974 Yamaha GYT cylinders with the roofs axial way up. Why? I am completely confused on this one. By the way the elevator shaft phrase was coined by the great Kevin Cameron!
B port short side radius below BDC on these 1974 Yamaha GYT cylinders with the roofs axial way up. Why? I am completely confused on this one. By the way the elevator shaft phrase was coined by the great Kevin Cameron!
Teriks - OK so here is the beginning of the project.
Baseline engine ( black sim ) is 31cc piston port on unleaded race gas , and the simulation is very close to the actual power curve supplied by the customer - who has his own dyno.
The initial stage of the project is to use existing engine parts that have proven to be reliable at 20,000, including a reed block from a Tiger King.
So a long stroke crank , with a new En39B billet much longer rod , with existing piston/bearings etc puts the new engine at 34.8cc ( 35cc being the class limit )
This is still very oversquare , always a bad idea , but this begins proof of concept for the EngMod optimised porting/pipe /new carb etc and the beginings of heading toward
what I consider as SOTA for bmep and piston speed.
Here is the result - the cases and cylinder are being designed in SolidWorks as we speak , and the Ti pipe is at the laser cutter already.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Porttiming - the pops are blowback thru the carb , coming from either the ignition rev limiter or simply the carb going way rich well past the peak power rpm.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
ok thank you wobbly
Tried to make the rotor cover in Carbon nylon, would work if I make a disc against the rotary valve I think. (Also has one to be cast in aluminum)
Polishing was also quite ok, enough for a surface treatment.
Someone who has some tips on companies that are good at surface treatments such as "DLC".
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
You sure are getting things done
I have had some stuff done at Ionbond: https://www.ionbond.com/about-ionbon...ations/sweden/
Youd have buy thru a company though, but given the waterjets etc Id guess that wont be a problem for you.
Condyn - nearly all the two stroke Jap engines from that period had the scavenging pattern as you describe with the B port up at around 45*, and its floor below BDC.
And there have been many examples of the boost port short turn lowered below BDC over the years , as they are angled up at 55+ - usually with a 1/2 moon concave curve , its something I have been meaning to try on a modern cylinder
for ages , but hard to rectify if its a fail.
The modern scavenging pattern reverses the axials , with the A port up at 25* + and the B at 15*- and I spent hours , years ago welding and epoxying up LC type ports to do exactly that.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Wob, Condyn, maybe this in theme. Quite by accident on Husqvarna TC65/85, we noticed that by rounding A and B the floor edges, up to r-3 mm, the power increased. I can’t say exactly why, but probably it helps mix flow back to transfers through the piston cutouts, after TDC and until the moment when A and B closed. With many others small modification on latest TC 85, all ended 12 hp at 7000rpm and rise without spots to 36.47 hp at 11756 rpm. from wheel.
I have had mixed experiences too.
The crank pins on the MB40 was more miss than hit, but IMO thats mostly due to the loads and base material.
-I had a batch of shafts that were too soft and wore out way too fast, so tried to save some with dlc.
If I ever finish my own cases, Im trying shafts in "Uddeholm Vancron SuperClean", should negate the need of coatings.
Shafts are finished, but still a long way to go before I have running engines.
If the ultimate power of a two stroke is limited by port areas,as I think it is, we can rate these 36.47hp from a 85ccm with 52 from a RA125.
52*(85/125)**,6666=39.25 to be compared with Katinas 36.47.
Considering that the 85ccm has relative higher thermal losses it is awfull impressive for a private run project..
There are currently 33 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 33 guests)
Bookmarks