very good idea
I will do it in 7 port today and I will get back to you with the STA
very good idea
I will do it in 7 port today and I will get back to you with the STA
Any idea which resin to use for mould intake rubber?
here is the result with 7 port with the true height !the blowndown is now insufficient
Portiming124, are you aware that you used 12 exclamation marks in 6 days on this forum alone?
You are in danger of exceeding your allocated amount of exclamation marks before the end of the month.
But do not fear, there is solution: in this forum it is permissible to end a sentence with a plain and simple period.
Sorry, I couldn't help myself. During my stay in Germany I seem to have developed an allergy to exclamation marks and prohibition signs
![]()
Sorry frits I will be careful.
Haha, Porttiming your lack of b-d area is very common. It seems there is room to widen the auxillaries quite a bit, maybe even raise them a little relative to the main but there is a thin line before ex pulse get compromised. Remaining after that is only to raise all of them, this has a y- pipe? I think they work well with long ex-durations btw, but the Engmod can probably tell you all this.
Achtung - not only are these Dutchmen bloody clever 2T tuners, they have a better grasp of propa English than many of us natives.
But re the 7 port ski engine , now that is a seriously wierd scavenging regime.
More especially as the B port is lower than the C , that are now C and D.
But , I have a feeling the axials are going to be wierd as well - post the transfer layout page .
I use Gadwin Printscreen , free and way more user friedly at copy/pasting any part , or all the screen to any file or printer.
I would lift the C ports about 1/2 way between the A and D , this will give more transfer STA again.
Then mod the Aux to get the Blowdown STA back in line , looks like the front top corner could go closer to the main Ex as well.
And get rid of those horrible port chamfers , completely unecessary.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
In plain english How the hell you get those numbers in real live engine![]()
God save us - the axials are a nightmare 8-17-9-50.
How people ( I wouldnt be kind and call them engineers ) actually got paid to produce this complete rubbish is beyond me.
No other two stroke in the world has ever had such a complete mess , looks to me like its not even possible to "fix " by dropping the cylinder and regrinding everything.
Maybe if the Aux floor is lifted , you could start again - as the Aux roof is 6.2mm lower than the main - wtf , gets weirder every time I look.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
look at the port layout (I put the cylinder upside down so that you can see the roof of the 'a' port) and also I removed the radius in the upper corner of the 'B' port as wobbly to recommend thank.
wobbly I checked with the piston to widen the auxiliary port exaust towards the center of the cylinder as you have drawn in red and I am at 1-2 mm from the pin of the piston
so yes I can go there a little on this side but not much, I will also go there on the side of the main port,
if I put the auxiliary ports 6 degrees lower than the main port, is that correct?
thank you
That's odd. Looks like a very nice casting though. Transfer the aux further out to the ex union. Transfers look pretty shallow from a sweeping inner point of view.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
The Aux are at 181* Duration now , Vs the 201* of the main port - I would go up to 191* but the transfer axial angles are the biggest issue.
How you fix them to be something normal like 25* 15* 55* I really dont know.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Bookmarks