With the thinking cap on:
Are we wholly certain as to what cooling the inner transfers does. Yes 1 Hp gain, but why? There is a cause (the cooling of the surrounding metal), but are there more than 1 effect?
A thought: Does cooling the inner wall therefore produce a temp gradient in the transfer stream were-by the inner flow of the stream is cooled and energy is taken out reducing the molecule excitement.
The effect being a reduction in energized eddies and a (poss) thinning of the boundary layer in the inner wall so as to assist the "turning of the corner" as there has to be a pressure difference across the area of the stream, inner wall to outer. The lowering of the outer wall temp having no effect as the outer wall is the "wall of death" for the stream.
Some cap you got there, gives me the giggles by proxy.
.
More from "2 Stroke Stuffing".
.
Have felt that the connecting rod that I initially chose for the project was a bit of a shortcut that did not feel really good. developed for an engine with a clearly more favorable environment than what I intend to expose it to.
This is now taken care of with a billet rod also got 1mm more that I wanted, to 89 mm.
So now I can nerd away with 48h in the tumbler and then DLC coting
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
I can't really grasp how the balancing works. A tandem counterrotating 0* firing delay has no vibration, 90v conterrotating 90*firing delay also good, boxer counterrotating 180* firing delay good yes? Parallell twin vibrates due to rocking, but why doesn't a same directon rotating 180* firing delay tandem work?
Hi there,
Just as an information, in the current OK engine from Vortex who makes easy 16.000 rpm a DLC treated connecting rod (104mm) performs without any problems, but the needle bearings are definitely NOT running on DLC coated surfaces.
According to the current status, DLC can be used up to max. 350 deg.C
Here it was only to be able to omit the silver shims, use a 5mm shorter crank pin and stiffen a lot more the crankshaft.
It's probably easier for the process to coat the whole conrod and then hone the bearing surfaces.
Cheers
Thanks Frits! I've been thinking about what you can expect in terms of temperature when setting clearances between surfaces if, for example, you were to try experimenting with Hydrodynamic bearings. Can't say I have any idea but usually don't see any major discolorations.
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
A 180* Tandem with same crank rotation would need an intermediate gear - just to make it work that way.
But balance wise , it would mean that when the crankwheel counterweights were at TDC/BDC they would form a rocking couple , just like a Parallel Twin @ 180.
Then when at 90* the two out of balance counterweights ( any number less than 100% BF ) would both be facing opposite each other ,forward or backwards - cancelling the horozontal resultant.
The intermedate gear needs to be the same size as each crank gear , making it too big to drive the clutch - and a balance shaft off that gear cant kill the rocking couple , as its in the same plane.
Thus another small gear is needed to drive the clutch - result is no advantage over a concurrent firing Tandem , but an extra power consuming gear/bearings , and less big bang tyre grip.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
What have i missed with dlc coating.
Diamond like coating, Why coat the whole rod?
Why even bother when not coating bearing surfaces?
Why not make an aluminiumrod with inserts for the needlebearings?
And no,, they won´t breake if using new tech, old alurods had a lifespan.
But new alloys make them way wey more reliable.
Watched a guy on youtube that had them in his engine for 9 years and none of them breaked.(1000+ Honda engine)
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks