Jan did you see any improvments in laptimes with the light pistons?
Jan did you see any improvments in laptimes with the light pistons?
Did the finance team see an improvement of the lapdancers with an 80% margin? That's fleecing it.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
We never tested this difference on a track (as far as I know)
On the dyno there was no difference at all..
I do not see a very light piston as an advantage.
Except vibrations of course!
The difference was 20 grams if I remember well.
The 'light' piston lost power after some 5 dyno runs.
The 'heavy' piston still gave the same power after 30 dyno runs.
And a cast piston was better than a forged one.
But there was no big difference, maybe only 0,2HP
Hi something that came to my mind. What model do you use for turbulence
https://www.simscale.com/projects/mu...radie-stinger/
An interesting thing is that carbon dioxide has a speed of sound at 267 ms at 20c. do not know if it is right to use it but air also feels wrong.
300 g exhaust gases. The composition is:
180 g of carbon dioxide
70 g water vapor
50 g of other substances (= 36.0 g of carbon monoxide, 9.5 g of hydrocarbon, 3.0 g of nitrogen oxide, 0.25 g of sulfur dioxide, 0.25 g of soot, 0.001 g of lead, 0.0006 g of aldehydes, 0.00025 g organic acids, 0.00025 g ammonia, small amounts of bensopyren.
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
I'm using SST in both the 3D and 2D. I used air as the fluid, that's another refinement I need to make.
Here's a link to the simscale 3D: https://www.simscale.com/projects/Oo...junction_flow/
I set the walls as no-slip, constant temp, and matched the cylinder, piston crown, exhaust header... to the values in engmod
The input pressure and temp were matched to the engmod at the respective crank positions as well.
In the 2D I'm trying to configure things as close as I can to the 3D (SU2 is not as intuitive as simscale)
Patrick Owens
www.OopsClunkThud.com
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
Sorry, I am very insistent but I think that here there are possibilities that the performance of the 2S engine will be improved
The video is the same as wobbly, with the difference that express conduits are used for it (wobbly uses the exhaust pipe itself).
Advantages, because you can incorporate some type of mechanism as a valve that controls and closes when the engine needs it.
Where do you think the Wobbly sea doo engine crankcase would have the lowest pressure be it, before TDC, at TDC or after TDC?
![]()
That video, you made it? I'm not sure what you mean. The sea doo engine has a y-pipe I think, the lowest pressure would vary in respect to crank angle, and why it made more power is not really cuncluded either, if I follow.
At least I can't think of any reason why it would be benficial.
There are currently 53 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 53 guests)
Bookmarks