So aside from just running that engine, you will need a long rod and sturdy alloy block to adapt the narrow GP barrel to a wider crankcase.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Now you need the F81m ignition rotor instead of the monster that is standard
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
There is also the modification for the bighorn gearbox that klemracing.com is selling : they use a fifth gear from the H1 and a purpose built first gear. http://www.klemmvintage.com/bighorntech.htm
This facebook message gives the price : 209 dollars, that was in 2018 https://www.facebook.com/12051123795...5923856084764/
.
It is the Benelli's in the pre 72 Post Classic class that I am hoping to chase around with the 250cc Kawasaki.
The ignition system is a DCCDIP2Race Ignitec firing both outputs into a Crain coil and surface gap plug. So basically something like an arc welder getting the Methanol burning. I need 14 Volts and 80 Watts for this system.
The generator is a modified light weight Chinese after market unit that I re wind for greater output. Hopefully I can get 80Watts out of this one. 80 Watts is not needed all the time as demand is RPM dependent. There is no battery in the system. Only two (4amp) Voltage rectifier regulators and 56000uF 50V capacitors. A simple push and it all lights up. We have similar systems on some of our other bikes so have complete confidence in it.
Another benefit of the Ignitec ignition is that it can pulse a power jet. The Ignitec works by grounding the power jet solenoid coil. So all I need is a temperature sensor on the head that supply's power to the solenoid when the engine gets hot and the power jet dumps extra Methanol into the carb to cool the engine. That way I get the start and first lap or so with the engine running clean. Then when its warmed up the extra Meth will keep it cooled and reliable for the rest of the race.
Easier maybe, but it wouldn't have the programable features of the Ignitec or the fire power. One of the other things I want to do is use the Ignitecs power valve servo feature to open/close a bleed on the side of the dwell section of the expansion chamber.
The object here is to vary the working pressure inside the expansion chamber. Earlier experiments on the dyno showed that the sick area in the torque curve just before the engine came on the pipe could be considerably cleaned up by dropping the pressure in the pipe. it became obvious on the dyno that the pipe pressure only had to be at its normal value at peak torque. Every where else it was better to have lower pipe pressure than you got with a fixed stinger optimized for maximum power.
I am also interested to see if dropping the pipe's working pressure after max power helps with reducing over rev detonation. And may be it will also help extend over rev itself.
I seem to recall conversations with Pete Sale where he was complaining about detonation in his 400 2T when he closed the throttle. Possibly something to do with an "unclean" mixture and chemistry with the methanol.
Yes. If you have maximum spark timing for drive out of corners. A 2T needs to retard the spark when the throttle is (partly) closed because there is reduced cylinder purging and pipe suction on part throttle and there is more hot dirty contaminated mixture left in the cylinder.
Jamathi talks about it here:- https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...tuner/page2000 about half way down the page.
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Bookmarks