
Originally Posted by
vro46i
Good day to all,
First-time writer, long-time reader. After much encouragement, I am bringing my "plate" to the dinner party.
Ironically this is also the first 2 stroke engine build that I am undertaking after owning a fleet of NSRs for nearly a decade and a half.
The engine I am basing the build on is a 1992 RGV125, with the aim of modifying/ assembling a 110cc engine that is reliable and competitive in the F4 bucket class,
The engine I bought was without the following components:
flywheel, stator, stator cover, Ignition pick up, oil pump, and piston. It is not the end of the world as I was able to locate parts on Ebay, but under the current Covid effect climate, postage is a killer.
RGV Crankcase tear down and configure the engine architecture.
I stripped the crankcase right down to bare casing to clean, inspect, deburr, and measure. At least I will have some quantitative figures to ask pertinent questions.
The bore and stroke specification from that particular model of RGV125 is 56mm and 50mm respectively.
To fit with the F4 rules, I will have to decrease the CC down to 110, I was advised that due to the overbore dimensions of the OEM cylinder bore the sensible way forward is to graft a 54mm diameter NSR 250 cylinder onto the RGV crankcase. This will bring the bore stroke ratio closer to 1:1. That is achievable as I have a few of those as per my initial comment of hoarding NSR parts. hahaha.
A bore reduction was considered, as the RGV cylinder has a steel sleeve as standard, but then the fun of getting the new steel sleeve manufactured, installed, port matched and lastly having to find the right piston.
Further cc reduction will be achieved by de-stroking the crank from 50mm to 48.3mm.
NSR barrell to RGV crankcase interface
Further disassembly allowed me to mock up the cylinder to the crankcase. What I discovered was that the bolt/ stud pitch of the pair of studs on the intake side is narrower than the RGV by half a hole each. Where the exhaust pitch is marginally better at 1/3 of the hole.
Hole misalignment issue aside there is the case of matching up the water jacket holes on the exhaust side, to ensure that there is enough casting to provide the necessary sealing surface.
Moving around to the intake and transfer ports, the RGV crankcase ports are significantly larger than what is present on the NSR cylinder. The intention here is to port match both cylinder barrel to the crankcase to allow for less disruptive flow transfer.
The plan for retrofitting the cylinder onto the crankcase will involve manufacturing the stud blanks out of 2024 or 6061 and winding them into the holes with Loctite 638. Once the Loctite has curred, the crankcase to cylinder mounting face will be milled to regain a flat surface.
Both the crankcase opening and the NSR barrel are then "clocked" to find the relative centres of the bore, thus allowing for alignment prior to drilling the NSR barrel mounting pattern.
In the scenario where the crankcase opening is significantly larger than the cylinder barrels are there any pitfalls I should be cognizant of before the carbide burr gets deployed? The mixture flow from the RGV crankcase into the NSR cylinder barrel converges via this significant change in cross-section, is this acceptable? what is preferred?
I have a lot of questions rattling around in my head which I am keen to ask but I will spread them out in a later post.
As this is my first post, I thank you for taking the time to read this, guidance and advice are greatly received and appreciated in this build.
regards
Bookmarks