Any one here had their cases scanned so you have all the relative points to be able to draw them up in 3D?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Any one here had their cases scanned so you have all the relative points to be able to draw them up in 3D?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
.
2Stroke Stuffing gets the 24/7 50cc engine running on the dyno, test run to hear the sound of it howling ...... https://youtu.be/oR_JCxyPdaQ
Wob,
probably the link has sent you elsewhere - bylund offers knock / Lambda / NOx shields for the arduino. I was talking about the knock shield.
As I understand the el cheapo Czech knock device has a given frequency range. Sometimes you need to ignore a certain rpm range, because it shows you mechanical noise.
And that is why I would like to test the bylund devide.
Lambda is helpful, but I am still struggling with it. My RS250 had a lambda output like attached in its WOT run and was WAY too lean till 8000 rpm.
So next time I will focus on my gut feeling whilst juggling jets first - and afterwards note the corresponding lambda.
Because of short circuiting in a two stroke. Lambda will always look lean and only start to come right as the engine gets up on the pipe and the trapping efficiency improves.
My EFI bike's Air/Fuel would be something like 18:1 and the reading would slowly improve until it was about 12:1 at max torque but of course in reality it was probably close to 12:1 in the cylinder all the way through even though the gauge registered lean. I think you are right to go on gut feel to get things right then use your recorded data as a development guide for later.
Mine might look even leaner than yours at low RPM but the Lambda trace on your dyno graph looks pretty much what I would expect. The big lean hump where the power dip is just before coming strongly onto the pipe makes sense too.
yep...it sounds tempting and an easy way forward but in reality if you are not at least an advanced CAD user it's rather useless.
Long story - I had one half of a 50cc scanned, model was 120 MB. First problem was converting it to solid: you need to heal the open surfaces to convert and while converting Catia kept crashing even on the latest workstations while Fusion only accepted smaller models. If you have the solid it won't have perfect cylindrical bearing seats nor flat surfaces where you just can place a concentric axis or planes, so some approximation is necessary. The "easier" way IMO would be to measure the necessary distances on a X-Y measuring machine, use those values to set critical dimensions and if you have a scan use that to roughly dial in the outer surfaces etc.
BTW - does anyone have a link for the Czech deto thingy? With 0-5V that could even be coupled with a datalogger (Starlane, Mychron) I suppose?
Knock gauge Czech
http://www.knockgauge.eu/
https://www.ebay.com/itm/18441368845...YAAOSw7aBVBEom
has anyone read this book
![]()
I have 3D models of Zenoah and Quickdraw cases for their 26 cc engines. It took a lot of measurements, not scans.
Lohring Miller
Stop thinking "Lambda says lean". You all know better than that. Lambda can only say how much unused oxygen is present in the exhaust gas. It does not say anything about the presence of unused fuel. So if you keep using the words Lambda and lean in the same sentence, you may be forcing your thoughts in the wrong direction.
The Czech gauge shows ONLY noise from the first 4 lights , so its easy to dial up the sensitivity to the max , showing only noise , by having them light up under load.
Then the red light shows ONLY deto when its happening and is independant completely of the bore.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Patrick Owens
www.OopsClunkThud.com
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 10 guests)
Bookmarks