Thanks for your offer, I will keep it in mind as the design progresses. I'm not far enough along to provide any solid design parameters.
The big issue in my opinion for a single piece crankshaft for this type of two stroke is the split cage big end bearings and need to assemble the conrod perfectly to ensure the bearings last. The fracture method is preferred by Rotax but those rods aren't sold without being assembled to the crank and it is unlikely I'll be able to replicate their process.
Paul Olesen
I agree, the rod length manufacturers are selecting has a lot to do with packaging. For me, since I'm designing the package I think I'd prefer to get good rod length, case volume, and reduce thrust loading first and then work the packaging second. I like to design in parallel so I can iterate on both as needed.
Arctic Cat is the only manufacturer with an engine design that has the cylinders made individually in the 800-850cc class. Everyone else uses a mono block cylinder so they won't work.
My plan is to design and cast the cylinders for my engine. They are the heart of a two stroke so compromising on the cylinder is a false step to take early on in my opinion. I've designed two stroke cylinders for others based on the design principles shared by Frits, Jan, Wobbly, Vannik, and others and have achieved good results so I don't feel like this is an overwhelming task and I quite look forward to it.
I don't know the 850 rod length but wish I did to establish a starting point. As I've mentioned to others you cannot purchase 850 rods without buying the crank assembly.
Paul Olesen
2Stroke Stuffing is getting somewhere. He is now nipping at the heals of the best conventional Dutch racing 50cc engines.
Wobbly, who was the company you deal with to get your dyno load cells and associated softwear?
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
Flett - I have used SportDevices software and their SP1 dyno data pack for over 15 years - the basic data box can do inertia or load cell or both.
After testing everything from Superflow to DynoMite etc , this is by far the easyest to use.
And it has two K type temp inputs on the front I use for egt and water temp.
All the inputs are configurable for stuff like Lambda , fan control etc.
The software is super easy to use , and I have the option of a Hall Effect sensor that reads the 126 teeth on the starter flywheel ( a small Toyota auto flex plate ) that is geared 1:1 to the flywheel.
I have asked them for many upgrades to the software ( free download ) and they do them very quickly.
The latest software versions specifically for Windoze 10 you have to be careful to download a driver to suit the old ( very ) serial port - RS232 that the box uses.
This really is the correct data system for reliable transfer in any noisy industrial applications , but of course nowdays no laptops or desktops have serial anymore
so you need to use an adapter.
Sportsdevices can give you a cable ( oddball ) that has the Serial to USB adapter on the computer end ie the cable is actually Serial wires , this works perfectly.
But maybe the latest version has usb as a default , dunno.
The only thing I would insist on , that many ignore , is to get a one way clutch , as is sold for tractor pto drives for mowers etc.
Then if an engine locks up , the dyno inertia wont keep driving the crank around to complete its destruction.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Thankyou Wobbly, Ken, Brett
Good morning all . I am currently working on an engine that has two rings and I am looking for a piston with only 1 ring that I cannot find. If I remove the bottom ring is that the groove will serve as a bypass between the transfer and the exaust. I think the groove is so small that maybe it doesn't show. what do you think about it? thank you.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks