I agree with you! at 239 * it looks like this when I tried.![]()
I agree with you! at 239 * it looks like this when I tried.![]()
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
Im glad you came up with what I would have thought was perfectly reasonable.
Does that give you a Inlet STA that matches the Blowdown and Transfers.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
It happens that if you make the disc straight on the opening side (if it is meant to be turned that way) it will be exactly 239 °. but as said, it may well be my mistake
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
What is the black magic involved in shaping the disc's edges. When it would be more precise and area-efficient to have them rounded as in the drawing?
I spent months at ZipKart testing the new Rotax 256 for Hines 250 Superkart World Champ winning engine. With every disc shape known to man. Convex and concave radi on the closing edges , angled back , angled forward timing edges , everything.
At the same timings of 140/88 nothing made any more power anywhere.
The forward angle on the closing side was adopted as the outer leading edge gave support to the disc and reduced the bad wear occurring on the case face , due to the inlet column inertia pushing hard
on the disc as it closed. Even with trick coatings applied this problem never really went away.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
No free lunch again
There are currently 26 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 25 guests)
Bookmarks