Frits,
Sorry for the delay.
Why is a fair question. There might be an opportunity to demonstrate an IC engine to run on either ammonia directly as part of the “green” renewable energy world. In Western Australia, there is much discussion and interest in creating huge renewable energy “farms”, with the intention of exporting this energy. It is recognised that transporting hydrogen, say by ship, is not practical (temperature, pressure and leakage) so ammonia is the logical alternative.
Further to this, apparently there are some applications where there is a place for smaller, lower speed powerplants, running directly on ammmonia(NH3).
Sort of interesting, an engine running on fertilizer.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm.”
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Very crafty TZ.
It would be interesting to find the upper limit on rv case volume before you start going backwards. With no familiarity with that engine, where did the rod/stroke ratio end up?
Wobbly, given the vastly different scenarios between developing each engine type rv/reed, which would you choose if given a clean slate to build a 2t moto GP engine? I would guess you could make either work, but just curious.
Condyn , one would have to do the R&D first.
On one side you have the Rotary , easy and has all been done before , then add Niels gibbs , not been done on a race engine , but is being designed as we speak in the form of a 500cc parallel twin
with twin Rotary Valves across the front ,with gibbs.
Then the reed , with 24/7 , about the same fiddly mechanism needed to drive that setup as the gibbs but as I havnt seen Rolands dyno results from Modena , I would have to reserve
judgment till the results were in.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
If you open a cryogenic facility, I might give it a miss. . .
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Hi,
I apologize for my poor English. For this I must used google translator. I have been following this forum for many years and this translator works great for me.
I give all praise to this forum and many experts. Here I found a lot of good information and answers. I live in Croatia and my hobby is mopeds. I mostly use them for experimenting and studying and very little for driving. Life circumstances determined it that way.
About thirty years ago, I designed and made a seven-speed gearbox for the Tomos 15SL moped. For the last few years, with longer or shorter interruptions, I have been trying to make a Two-stroke simulator.
I based the simulator mostly on the work of Prof. Blair. The simulator is not completely finished. But it already gives me a lot. The results obtained guide me how to arrange the engine parameters for what I want. The appearance of the simulator can be seen in the picture.
![]()
Isn't technology marvellous! Here (New Zealand) we were brought up speaking just one language due to our colonial past and isolation. We then feel somewhat embarrassed that we speak no other languages when we are exposed to the world wide Web. Sadly even the alternative indigenous language was suppressed when I was young and sign language would be great to learn.
Now you are here posting better English than most of us can manage through software augmentation.
Welcome.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Welcome Skako. I must say your 'poor English' is definitely better than what Google Translator can do, and I am looking forward to more contributions from you.
Putting together a simulator will have forced you to fully understand every physical, mathematical and logical step in the process, and that alone will have given you a level of insight not many of us will achieve. My respect!![]()
Vannik
The simulator is based on the first book by Prof. Blair.
I've been reading some of your work.
You have made a very good EngMod2t.
I would love to have it and compare the results from my simulator side by side, to see where I got.
My simulator is relatively simple, student-grade, but it performs gas-dynamic calculations in the way set by prof. Blair.
I will post some characteristic graphs that can show it better.
Now I know what simulator means.
Even more, how to get closer to the goal with the help of the simulator.
Vannik, you have great respect from me!
Frits,
I read a lot of your expert comments on this forum and also on another forum.
I know how to evaluate what is good and what I need.
I am aware how much I know.
I am aware even more how much I don't know.
I have many of your comments translated into my language and stored in one file.
Frits, you have great respect from me!
trevor amos
I will put a few more thumbnails of the gearbox
'-------------------
Here are some of the graphs.
It is not always possible to obtain a good characteristic of the graph.
This means that I have to change parameters on that simulation model.
I fix it until I get closer to my goal.
These are all simulation models that have not been verified and that I should check on a Dyno-desk, which I unfortunately do not have.
I hope that will happen one day.
There are currently 17 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 17 guests)
Bookmarks