I had an idea to reform the combustion chamber of our 26 cc restricted engine class to lower the chamber volume. We were only allowed to remove material for modifications, but there were no restrictions on spark plug design. I suggested a plug with a large base that created a toroidal combustion chamber. My design used a surface discharge end. My friend, the late Jim Allen, liked the surface discharge idea and modified some conventional plugs. He was already running a toroidal head button in his unrestricted design 26 cc engine. I don't believe he found any advantage over conventional plugs in his toroidal chamber. Below are pictures of my idea and Jim's actual plug.
Lohring Miller
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Regarding the spark gap " shadow " produced with a ground strap. I did dyno tests to prove or disprove the idea of indexing the plug , that rumour had it was an advantage.
In a box of 4 I by chance found two R 7376 -10.5 plugs that indexed 180* opposite each other.
One had the gap facing the Exhaust port the other facing the boost port.
The one with the unmasked gap facing the Exhaust I convinced myself after multiple back to backs was better , by maybe a 1/10 or 2/10 Hp - the width of the graph lines , probably not within the limits of the dyno read accuracy.
I still do it today , just because I did the test and it makes me feel clever , even though Frits has proved otherwise more than once.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Here I slightly improved the previous version of the calculation for the suction flow into the crankcase of the 2T engine. The calculation is carried out according to the work of Dr. Hoffman. The calculation method is multiple iterative, conservative and preserves the flow of mass and energy through the orefice. I studying for further.
![]()
a French ignition manufacturer cuts or drill the ground electrode of its spark plugs.
it indicates that by testing the spark plug under pressure of 10 bars. the sparks go from the electrode to the base.
it indicates having a better revving without the ground electrode.
its ignitions are at fixed advance. according to him, the variable is useless. Turbulence velocity with rpm has the same effect
![]()
Here are some more interesting diagrams for analyzing waves and the charging effect. I was looking for the length of the suction pipe that gives the maximum filling of the crankcase. Everything else is unchanged. Crankcase temperature 358K, intake pipe temperature 280K, ambient temperature 293K, atmospheric pressure 1 bar.
![]()
Skako , I see a ref to the inlet as 118* what does this mean ie on your analysis where does the port open and close in relation to TDC .
Is that the pink line shown as IC around 59* before and after .
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
No speedy sleeve. This is the drive side. The drive gear has the seal surface for the rotary valve covers oil seal to run on.
Hello again
Long time no posting.
I was having a conversation the other day with a friend and he came in conversation that low torque engines like bigger front sproket, this is not about the transmission ratio. He says that bigger cc bikes with high torque like smaller sproket, but low cc with high rpm big front sproket. He showed me a file where it talks about this, but its in Portuguese.
Then I research around some fast 125cc bikes and the sprokets tend to be from 17 to 20 so I got a bit curious about it.
Cheers
Sounds like he is all torque.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are currently 163 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 163 guests)
Bookmarks