ESE's works engine tuner

[SwePatrick]

Everone want´s more speed...
So, go the easy way with boost!!
Shuuututututututuuu!!!

A VERY simplified guide:

[ken seeber]

Surely this is the go....high power , low emissions , no expansion chambers....dyno proven...

And here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5czHDU6pK8E

Lots of other 2 stroke stuff on youtube under "driving4answers" 2 strokes

[lohring]

As I posted earlier, most of the problems with two strokes were solved a long time ago. The Junkers opposed piston aircraft two strokes were reasonably successful both with their weight and especially with their fuel economy. If you replace the blower with a modern electric turbocharger you get even better power, weight, and economy.

Lohring Miller

[lohring]

A friend built an inertial dyno based on our very successful small engine dyno. Though we had maybe thousands of trouble free runs, he has had issues. Pictures of both dynos are below. Ours is on the bench with the shield.



His problems have been:

Constant failures of the square key connecting the engine to the dyno

Failures of the round shaft he replaced the square shaft with

Slip of the shaft Locktited into the flywheel



The only difference between his dyno and ours is the position of the clutch and the Lovejoy coupling. We have the coupling before the clutch and he has the clutch before the coupling. My thought is that the clutch is a solid connection and in our design the coupling insulates the engine's torque fluctuations from the flywheel's constant inertia better. We never did more than twist the square key. Others with dynos we copied never had any of these problems either.



What are your thoughts?

Lohring Miller