Page 2708 of 2708 FirstFirst ... 17082208260826582698270627072708
Results 40,606 to 40,612 of 40612

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #40606
    Join Date
    25th October 2022 - 04:48
    Bike
    1974 yz 125
    Location
    Minnesota (United States)
    Posts
    23
    Great info but I'm a little unclear on some things:



    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    Jetski's give you the opportunity to really do some great things with the cooling circuits.
    In the 1100cc SeaDoo world champ engines , they had water jacketed pipes. This meant I could double the
    cold length of the Exhaust duct,

    What length is being doubled? The "Wobbly on exhaust port design" doc says 1.5*bore for length of exhaust port, so double that? OR do you mean like double whatever i was before you modified it?

    with hot water on the other side -

    Hot water on the other side of what? You mean the exhaust port portion was kept very cold then the rest of the manifold/exhaust was much hotter?

    this gave way less deto level from hot A/F being shoved back past the piston.
    The head was a completely different circuit, with hot water taken from the pipe to reduce the temp delta between the combustion chamber wall and the expanding hot gasses.

    How hot did you run the head? So you did this by blocking off coolant flow from cylinder to head and running water from the exhaust water jacket to get the head hotter than the cylinder?

    On the dyno it was found that what I thought was a good cylinder exit temp, was way too cold.
    We ran big clearances , but there was more power to be had with the exit temp up at 70*C due to bore friction I think, than down at 50*C to over cool the incoming transfer charge.

    Super interesting. I have a couple of engines currently running around 120 degrees F (~50 C) on a heat tape stuck on the head (so I assume water temp is about that). Sounds like I should be trying to get that a little warmer, and the head even warmer yet. My thinking was cooler = better, or at least I didn't think 120F was too cool.

    The cylinders with close bore centers like all the RD/LC/TZ/YPVS/Banshee's respond real well to the cold transfer tops, that in stock form had a completely random " water everywhere " approach.
    So one approach might be to isolate head from cylinder, run water in the top of the cylinder water jacket from the intake side, let it flow past transfers and down around the exhaust port and into the first part of the exhaust manifold and out, so the intake side of the cylinder and top of the transfer ports is coolest. Then run hot water from the exhaust into then out of the head.

  2. #40607
    Join Date
    8th February 2007 - 20:42
    Bike
    TZ400
    Location
    tAURANGA
    Posts
    4,106
    JetSki's typically have super short Exhaust ducts , the big oversquare ones would be lucky if its length equals the bore.
    In the case of the Seadoo I doubled the duct length as part of the pipe header, and there was a separator plate between that and the hot pipe water jacket.
    The duct plus the bolt on manifold extension had cold water supplied thru the flange face as is normal in those engines.
    There was no flow at all from the cylinder to the head, it had a plain copper gasket with no holes, O rings on both sides.
    The head inflow was from the Exhaust jacket , yes.
    Thus the cylinder exit temp was controlled by jets, as was the head exit flow , with completely separated supplies and exit jets.

    The cylinder made best power at 70*C - honestly, cant remember how hot the head was - but it was well over 100 though.
    But I did drill a radial series of holes just outside the bore O ring to allow the colder cylinder water to cool the alloy head insert right next to the squish band.
    Those engines were very deto resistant in the config with squish band and extended duct cooling - enabling much higher com than we had previously maxed out at.
    The thing was a raped ape to the first buoy.
    Keeping the back of the combustion chamber hot, has no effect on deto , but helps prevent combustion energy simply being dumped into the coolant for no reason.
    Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.

  3. #40608
    Join Date
    26th April 2006 - 12:52
    Bike
    Several
    Location
    Hutt Valley
    Posts
    5,126
    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    If you are going to actually build a pipe at some stage I dont get why you are even considering using a design that is so obviously flawed.
    The only reason it would be " insensitive " is because the engine is making bugger all power.
    Post the .pack file on the site and I will help with something a bit cleverer.
    It took ages.
    The model is basic and probably flawed.

    TF125_A.zip
    Heinz Varieties

  4. #40609
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,526
    I have been playing with rotary valves tonight.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	70cc RV (1).jpg 
Views:	101 
Size:	644.4 KB 
ID:	356380 70cc sports cylinder on a RG50 converted to rotary valve.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	70cc RV (2).jpg 
Views:	55 
Size:	805.7 KB 
ID:	356381 Blue line Click image for larger version. 

Name:	70cc RV (3).jpg 
Views:	49 
Size:	800.1 KB 
ID:	356382 Red line.

    Interestingly it still idles pretty well with the radical rotary valve. I think that with a bit of jetting and ignition work the red line will be a good 25RWHP.

    The next move is to turbo it. So maybe 30RWHP may be possible.

  5. #40610
    Join Date
    8th February 2007 - 20:42
    Bike
    TZ400
    Location
    tAURANGA
    Posts
    4,106
    TeeZee, just remember that the RSA made over 16Bar BMEP @ 13,000 ( crank ) with a valve timing of around 140/90 - and going much over 140* makes front side jetting a nightmare.
    I dont understand why you and many others are running these small stroke engines at well below the accepted mechanical limits of piston speed, as Hp = T X RPM so if
    you engineer the overall efficiency to hold up the torque , then going from 13,000 to say 15,000 will increase power by 15% - and you wont need " radical " anything to achieve that
    level of performance.
    Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.

  6. #40611
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,280
    Blog Entries
    2
    I was well guilty of that sin. However I started on MB50s where the ring tips would fly off if revved to 12000 (even the 100s were more tolerant.
    Then onto RG50s where the cranks didn't tolerate 13000 for any time plus the rings were thick enough to lose seal above 12000.
    I thought the next stage with TZR crank parts and Kx pistons at 13000 were bone reliable. So I could have pushed higher but was reluctant due to earlier (regular) mishaps.
    Commuter bikes had hard limits.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  7. #40612
    Join Date
    12th March 2010 - 16:56
    Bike
    TT500 F9 Kawasaki EFI
    Location
    Hamilton New Zealand
    Posts
    2,881
    The water cooled, powervalve AG out and about at a local maize paddock day, blends in well. An opportunity to tune the powervalve settings, very worthwhile. I have re fitted the boost bottle, power now is much like any modern powervalve engine with smooth delivery, the 6000 to 7000 dip is gone (as I'd expect) and also the surging that used to happen .... completely gone.
    No change to jetting, since the original air cooled cylinder.
    My next cylinder will most certainly be twin exhaust port but 54 x54 , not this rubbish 48 x 58 I have now.
    It's surprisingly good fun to ride now, cant wait for the new Vinduro / VMX season 👍
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20250629_132721.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.00 MB 
ID:	356384   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20250424_171826.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	778.7 KB 
ID:	356385  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •