yep, strike one up for us old fat blokes!![]()
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Thanks for that a load of inspiration there. I see from the youtube clip it gets along nicely. Though the gearbox seems to do it a bit tough on the downshifts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQKXm...eature=related
Not even remotely bucket related but a cool two stroke all the same and up for sale
http://www.ozebook.com/compendium/suzipics/sparton.html
My neighbours diary says I have boundary issues
Barry Hart had a few "world beaters" like this was one. He had a bit to do with Armstrong as well as the "silver dream racer" .
The designs were always seemingly over hyped up by a British media starved for success. Which was a shame because they were decent if not that innovative designs OK he borrowed a fair bit.
I seem to remember there was a much more successful Dutch 3 cylinder TZ350 and a home build three from the south island Grumph has mentioned.
I have an article that will will post when i can be arsed looking for it.
http://yorkshireferret.blogspot.co.n...-and-more.html
http://armstrongfactoryracing.com/history.html
Phoenix (silver dream racer) wow never realized the Buell connection later.Armstrong Motorcycles began in the late 70's when Armstrong Industries bought up CCM (Clews Competition Motorcycles) then later, Cotton Motorcycles and Barton Engineering. These smaller companies were amalgamated to form the best motorcycle engineering brains and knowledge at the time this side of Japan. Terry Wilson's Cotton had developed a super fast 250cc machine, initially produced with a one-off L-twin 250cc Rotax engine which was especially built for Cotton. This engine was developed by Rotax, and went on to become the infamous Type 256 inline twin. The first CCM Armstrong 250cc racers were essentially rebadged Cotton's, with a more "TZ-esque" frame designed by Mike Eatough, incoporating a vertical rear shock design.
Rotax 256 250cc engines were used initially but in 1981 an improved designed was developed in house by Armstrong Technical Director, Barry Hart (ex-Barton Engineering) including horizontally split crankcases, improved porting, cooling and individual cylinder heads. Initially developed as a 350cc the CM36 engine was used in both 250 & 350cc guises for the works machines. Several variants were produced, with the last model being updated in 1983, which featured 180 out of phase cranks, instead of the usual counter rotating cranks with both pistons rising and falling at the same time
http://www.flickr.com/photos/85689738@N00/5713273745
http://www.flickr.com/photos/85689738@N00/5713261305
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Ok ... Chambers bike is lighter than mine.
Checking the relative weights of the wheels, as spoked wheels are supposed to be lighter.
Front wire wheel 9.0kg
Rear wire wheel 9.5kg
Front FZR wheel 9.0kg
Rear FZR wheel 12.0kg
FZR sprocket carrier 2.5kg
Not as much difference as I had expected. Only 2.5kg and that was all in the back wheel. How to loose the equivalent of the sprocket carrier, use a wide front from some other bike and fixed alloy sprocket perhaps. And replace the rear caliper with something lighter.
From Memory Nudemetals said a long time ago that FZR400 front wheel (possibly other Yams as well) takes a DT175 sprocket direct.
The ones i chose are Well Honda
HONDA CBR 400 NC23 FRONT Wheel 3.5X17
HONDA CBR 250R MC19 2.5X17
I think the 3.5 (NC23) is actually lighter than the 2.5 (MC19). The later 6 spokes are lighter than my 3 spokes i think.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Geee those bare wheels don't weigh much.
Std RS front 6 lbs or 2.7kg and rear 7 lbs or 3.2 kg.
Conversion assistant http://www.convertunits.com/from/lbs/to/kg
I weighed a set of RS wheels with disk tire sprocket etc.
RS complete Front wheel 8.0kg complete Rear wheel 9.5kg
compaired to:-
Wire complete Front wheel 9.0kg complete Rear wheel 9.5kg
FZR complete Front wheel 9.0kg complete Rear wheel 12.0kg
Complete RS swing arm 3.5kg and FZR swing arm 4.5kg.
Although I am not that convinced about the accuracy of bathroom scales for measuring anything, they at least give an indication of the wheels relative weights.
I might have a FZR400 front, I will dig it out and have a look.
down side of cast wheels on a supermoto?
Note this compares std size which i think is 3 and 4.5 inchx17
http://http://motard-supermoto-wheels.sportsontheweb.net/index.htm
Aren't cast wheels a lot heavier? The common complaint is extra weight with cast wheels, but with CBR250 wheels (CBR250R & CBR250RR specifically) this is not true. We've weighed the CBR wheels, fully kitted out with tyres, discs and sprocket, against typical quality motard spoked wheels using Talon hubs and Morad rims. The results?:
CBR250r wheels complete with disks tires spockets etc .
Front spoked wheel: 11.1 kg 3-spoked cast wheel: 10 kg 6-spoked cast wheel: 10.5 kg
Rear spoked wheel: 13.1 kg 3-spoked cast wheel: 13.8 kg 6-spoked cast wheel: 13.9 kg
A std ZXR750 front wheel from the 90's is 4.5 KGs (bare weight)
Most of the weight saving from aftermarket wheels (up to 46% in the article i have here) is that most weight saving come from the rear with only approx 1 kg able to be lost off the front. Compared with a 4.0kg wheel vs 7.64kg oe for the rears.
SO it looks like my gut feeling of the 3 spoke vs the 6 spoke is wrong if at least on these the 3 spoke is lighter WTFIUWT
Although it may be because my front is a MC19 and is not hollow spoked?
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
There are currently 19 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 19 guests)
Bookmarks