Page 612 of 2703 FirstFirst ... 11251256260261061161261361462266271211121612 ... LastLast
Results 9,166 to 9,180 of 40537

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #9166
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    Quote Originally Posted by ief View Post
    But still, if I hear dinamik simming 47 and making 34 then what's the use ai?
    I think your right, changing things like port timing is wrong but varying the combustion and I guess delay and other related variables is the way to get the simulation to reflect your engines reality at the crank.

    Although EngMod2T is just a simulation and not real life on a dyno, it does suggests the outcome of any changes and direction to take, and EngMod does this very well. But sometimes I have found myself tickling the simulation to get a bigger hp number, with changes that can't be made in real life.

    Below is Wobs view.

    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    Combustion Efficancy, I vary depending upon the projected quality of the elements.

    Running high com on Avgas with a toroid, in a square engine its up around 92%
    Low com on pump with crap chamber shape and oversquare, its down around 82%.
    Then lastly I move it around a bit if I have what seems to be too much power, but the curve shape is on the money.
    It seems to be a fudge factor that can be used to move all the power up and down, it doesn't change the shape.

    Re the computer sims believability factor, I have done so many trips to the dyno and got exactly what the sim said I would that its simply not an issue any more.
    Only when reaching the outer limits, such as trying to model an RSA, that depends so much on alot of info we still havnt seen yet ( such as the PWM curve for the powerjets etc),then its a case of crap in = crap out.

  2. #9167
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Cylinder 005.jpg 
Views:	82 
Size:	236.0 KB 
ID:	270649

    Chambers offers a virtual Chocolate Fish to the first person who correctly identifies what this cylinder came from and nope, not a lawn mower.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Cylinder 004.jpg 
Views:	97 
Size:	241.8 KB 
ID:	270648

    Low wide inlet port, transfers and exhaust are just drillings.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Cylinder 009.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	228.8 KB 
ID:	270647

    The carbon build up clearly shows the combustion gases have been back flowing down the transfer ports. More so on the exhaust port side and its instructive how far the carbon extends down the port wall, apparently this happens on part throttle at high rpm.

    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    It seems that at high rpm and part throttle the pressure in the cylinder is higher than in the crankcase when the transfers open and hot burnt combustion gases back flow down the transfers. Part throttle detonation is the current big issue for our 30+hp air-cooled engine. Retarding the ignition on part throttle is only part of the solution.
    The above Quote links to a detailed discussion by Jan Thiel about this back flow phenomenon and its effects on high performance 2-stroke reliability.

  3. #9168
    Join Date
    7th February 2009 - 17:47
    Bike
    93 kwacker zxr750
    Location
    palmerston north
    Posts
    1,705

    Cool

    a chain saw

  4. #9169
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,191
    Blog Entries
    2
    Well I'm glad you did the larger carb experiment. That is not what I would have expected either, but it underlines my mantra of 'test everything'. I have been surprised many times fitting stuff that is going to be better & isn't. For instance I had a 24mm carb for my 50 as well as a 26 & a 28. All Mik flatslides. I made a new inlet & it was 26mm at the manifold.

    Of all the carbs the 28 was the best. The 24 which I was hoping would be my kart track setup wasn't as good but almost matched the 28 in overrev. the 26 was worse all over no matter what jets were fired at it. Clearly the slope may be dependant on the air bleed, but you should be able to get some of the curve to match, like peak.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  5. #9170
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by crazy man View Post
    a chain saw
    I thought that too, but how do you run a chain saw at part throttle/high rev?

    So my guess is, radio controlled plane.

  6. #9171
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    Quote Originally Posted by crazy man View Post
    a chain saw
    We have a winner

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	chocolate_fish_1.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	53.2 KB 
ID:	270655


    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    I thought that too, but how do you run a chain saw at part throttle/high rev?
    Yes, good point ... not sure.

  7. #9172
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave View Post
    Well I'm glad you did the larger carb experiment. That is not what I would have expected either ... For instance I had a 24mm carb for my 50 as well as a 26 & a 28.
    Interesting about the different carbs you have tried on the 50 and that the 28 was the best, where I would have gone for the 24.

  8. #9173
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    Yes, good point ... not sure.
    It's bugging me for some reason.

    Only thing my less than optimum mind can come up with, is that if the governor on a chainsaw works the same as a lawn mower by oscilating the throttle butterfly quickly when the revs get up. I suppose that is part throttle.

  9. #9174
    Join Date
    11th July 2008 - 03:59
    Bike
    N/A
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    Below is Wobs view.
    An addition on those, but only from 'sim life' testing:
    Ceff will impact the overrev. Lower the factor and it has less power/rpm in overrev. Also, higher Ceff setups, are more sensitive to ADV and have higher cylinder temperatures.

  10. #9175
    Join Date
    7th February 2009 - 17:47
    Bike
    93 kwacker zxr750
    Location
    palmerston north
    Posts
    1,705
    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    We have a winner

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	chocolate_fish_1.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	53.2 KB 
ID:	270655




    Yes, good point ... not sure.
    yum chocy fishie

  11. #9176
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    It's bugging me for some reason.

    Only thing my less than optimum mind can come up with, is that if the governor on a chainsaw works the same as a lawn mower by oscilating the throttle butterfly quickly when the revs get up. I suppose that is part throttle.
    All the Still chain saws I have had something to do with didn't have a governor, just a trigger throttle. Although you didn't hold it on part throttle much, it was more like all or nothing but I guess all the momentary times on part throttle all add up.

    For a chain saw I suspect you also get this blow back when its maxed out and won't rev any higher because there is insufficient blowdown time area to support any more rev's.

  12. #9177
    Join Date
    31st May 2012 - 04:34
    Bike
    Honda Hawk
    Location
    NC,USA
    Posts
    6
    How about just taking all the vent lines from the carb and either apply a small pressure or a small vacuum to them to get an indication of which way your jetting needs to go ? It is a lot faster then stopping the testi to change jets !

    Gary


    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    Having managed 29hp with the taper bored 24mm OKO I wanted to see what difference a bigger carb might make. The taper bored OKO is 31mm at the engine flange so I bored another OKO out to 30mm at the slide and 31 at the flange.

    Set the 30mm carb up with a main jet one size bigger than the 24 and ran it up. It started and warmed up ok but when I tried to move up through the gears it wouldn’t accelerate.

    Anything over half throttle and it just sat there going Blarrrr, sounded rich but I was caught out thinking that the other night. If it was lean I would have expected it to just cut out, it kept going but no matter what I did with the throttle it just would not pickup, sounded flat and rich.

    The taper bored 24 had a 145 main, the 30 a 150 so it’s hard to imagine the 30 needing a main smaller than the 24. ???? ran out of time to look into it. I didn't think of it at the time but I should have pulled the power jet feed line off. Killing the power jet would have quickly told me if it was rich or lean.

    Kel and I now think the flat sound to the exhaust is due to the top exhaust port chamfer blunting the exhaust note as the port is no longer cracking open suddenly, is that a good thing ???.

  13. #9178
    Join Date
    29th December 2011 - 04:14
    Bike
    rd 350 ypvs 1985
    Location
    netherlands
    Posts
    188
    Oeps, seems I 'lied' a little, I was under the impression comb eff. was @ 0.83 but it was set @ 0.87, that cost me about 3 hp (so 38.5 now) but I presume I can make up for it by working on the exhaust once again (all ready have made about 70 versions/ adaptations )

    Other then that I could see it as being pretty ok-ish, comb file is mostly wobs work with exception of the ignition curve as is the temp file.

    I found most of the positive changes became; as wide as much tr, little longer tr duct, slightly shallower angles, lowered exhaust and aux (from what i had) shape of the inlet was good for one kw (!) and reducing the carb length and longer intake (83.5 degr if memory serves) on the RV.

    And of coarse fine tuning the exhaust...

    Anyway, I got some more playing to do wit 0.83 comb. eff. See if I can get it back to 40+

  14. #9179
    Join Date
    7th June 2009 - 13:29
    Bike
    Norton Manx
    Location
    Over the Rainbow
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Cylinder 009.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	228.8 KB 
ID:	270647

    The carbon build up clearly shows the combustion gases have been back flowing down the transfer ports. More so on the exhaust port side and its instructive how far the carbon extends down the port wall, apparently this happens on part throttle at high rpm.
    I think it also happens on full throttle at high rpm when the blow down becomes to short for the rpm and the pressure of the remaining combustion products in the cylinder push into the transfers and prevent the inflow of fresh mixture. Adjusting the blow down time area is a little trick that can be used to govern the top rpm (speed) of the chain saw, lawn mower, moped or scooter etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    ... the governor on a chainsaw works the same as a lawn mower ...
    Drew may be right, chainsaws and lawn mowers et all have simple built in governors.

  15. #9180
    Join Date
    4th January 2009 - 21:08
    Bike
    YLR150RR and a RD350LC
    Location
    Not far from Ruapuna
    Posts
    2,368
    Quote Originally Posted by FastFred View Post
    I think it also happens on full throttle at high rpm when the blow down becomes to short for the rpm and the pressure of the remaining combustion products in the cylinder prevent the inflow of fresh mixture. Adjusting the blow down time area is a little trick that can be used to govern the top rpm (speed) of the chain saw or Moped Scooter etc for a simple self governor.



    Drew may be right, chainsaws and lawn mowers et all have simple built in governors.
    The pipe probably helps govern the revs too, I think microlights use the pipe to cap the rpm as well
    My neighbours diary says I have boundary issues

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 32 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 32 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •