Running a KT100 is fraught with heat problems, as it affects every part of the testing.
Simply put, you MUST have the same head temp and case temp at the start of every test.
Then monitor the egt at the end of each test.
For example you can change the pipe length, run up the engine to get your reference head and case temp.
But the egt at peak rpm may be 100* lower.
So you must then turn the tap and change the jetting.
This then means repeat the test, until you reach the same egt as previously.
Then overlay the curves to see if the new pipe length actually is better than the last one.
All you are doing is replicating what would happen on the track,but making very sure the conditions are perfectly equal.
This enables the 1/10 Hp resolution in changes to be seen with confidence, as head or case or egt temp has a way bigger influence on the dyno power reading, than any pipe or small port timing change would ever produce.
Same issue with a water cooled 125.
If the change produces a change in egt, then you must go back and rejet and rerun the test.
On track we will always be shooting for a reference egt,by changing jets based on the current air conditions,no matter what the port timing or the ignition curve or the pipe shape,may be.
So the dyno result must reflect this process to be able to document on track reality and thus performance, with any useful accuracy.
Bookmarks