Rob - You can post that Excel gearbox sheet as an Excel file for people to download if you want
Rob - You can post that Excel gearbox sheet as an Excel file for people to download if you want
I used to borrow one but after a while i thought well whats the point i want the timing in degrees not mm...
Here is my slant probably not technically correct either........
Go to the Chainsaw shop get a piston stopper (they are made to do up flywheel nuts i think.)
they look like a bolt with a thread to suit the plug hole and have a rounded end. maybe $10
get a timing disk, a nice proper one and make a sturdy marker that for the timing disk numbers.
insert the stopper in the plug hole move around to towards TDC take note of the degrees mark.
Rotate the engine in the opposite direction half way between the two points where it stops (assuming you have a central plug hole and your cylinder is not offsett) will be TDC.
Now put the pointer at true tdc and mark your flywheel in degrees. according for you tests scribe and use different colour nail polish as it stands out nicely and gives a nice visual indication
People used to make stopper and tdc gauges out of hollowed out plugs and steel rods when they wanted to set up the timming in MM
now i can see there will be alternate views on this.
BTW i have used one of these stoppers to tighten a flywheel before in an emergency i am not proud but it worked.
i used to use an old broken gear to lock the primary normally.(stole that idea from Kevin Cameron i think?)
Last edited by husaberg; 9th January 2013 at 22:58. Reason: i just found it in a Ron Lewis article he describes it better than me too funny
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
I've got a tdc tool buzziti (spelling?). Then just made up a conversion chart (mm to degrees).
But the spark plug solution works well.
http://www.scooterhelp.com/tips/timi...ing.tools.html
Try google translator, I won't say it gets clear as crystal but better then russian.
I've seen people post that before, and the truth is that as long as the piston stop touches the same point on the piston crown going forward and backward, the middle point between the 2 degree wheel readings is TDC regardless of if the stop touches the highest point of the piston or not.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Hi Rich these are the graphs from the back to back test. (Rich Blue Line) in this graph I dont think my extra top end makes up for your better low end drive.
This is my current (old) engine. (Rich Blue Line) this looks quite good from 9 onwards, below that it drops dead. But I am sure with a bit of work it could be extended at the top and bottom.
If my engine could be made to pull from 7,500-8000 rpm I would be a happy chap. Now all I need is to lose 25kg 35 years and build a lighter bike.
The only real difference between the new and old (Blue line) engine is the extra blow down time area of the side ports (Red line). I think that with some sort of valve in the side ports I could join the graphs and then an ATAC valve like FarmerKens for plumping up the bottom end would do the trick.
Anyway at the moment my interest is the CVT system. The front pulley is upside down because it sits on the table better that way.
At first sight it might seem that the distance between the pulleys has to be very accurate but what does very accurate mean? 10mm 5mm 1mm 0.1mm 0.5mm 0.05mm.
There are some simple ways of getting some sort of idea, like measuring the distance between the shaft centers of a real CVT Scooter and its easy to get a good measurement of the distance between shaft centers with some simple engineering tricks.
After taking a logical look at the way the sheaves clamp the belt I don't think a mm or two here or there between shaft centers will make much difference.
And I think that if one gets it really wrong, the range of effective CVT ratios might be affected but as long as the friction on the belt is high enough when clamped by the moving sheaves the thing will run anyway.
But if one was truly concerned about the relative length between the logical centers of the belt as well as the pulley pre load frictional force on the belt itself, here is a simple solution to adjust the belt tension.
[QUOTE=TZ350;1130462968]
After trying both versions of your engine I would be hard pushed to choose which I would prefer. Before it nipped at Toke the beast was not horrible to ride and with a bit more time on it I think would be the faster of the two, Saying that the Taumarunui version was easy to ride but I was not able to ride it to its potential due to the Det problems and if I had been able to rev it out I may lean towards that one.![]()
With a bit of fiddling I think we may be able to get the best of both.
I am going to take the head off tomorrow to see what damage the det has done, water injection or a pressure dump valve in the chamber for when its in over rev may be the answer.
Thousands of 2Ts have done thousands of Kms happy running in overev with no issues.
Both of the dyno graphs would indicate that either of the engines as run, are a complete waste of time reving past 12500 anyway.
If the thing is detoing up there, well over the torque peak, then only 2 things can be happening.
There is way too much advance past 12,000, or the air corrector is forcing the A/F ratio way too lean.
This would be the sort of effect you would see if a too big solenoid power jet was being switched off over the top.
Look into and correct these simple issues before even thinking of dicking around with water and and or dump valves that are completely unnecessary.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
There are currently 23 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 23 guests)
Bookmarks