Usually I am, Husa, but not in this case. That's why I called them motors and not engines.
It mentions "inject water into the combustion chamber, exchanging temperature for steam pressure."
Guess what lowering the combustion temperature will do to the engine temperature.
It has been done, a couple of years ago, by Harald Bartol, on the 125 cc works KTM roadracers.As far as storing generator power goes you don't need a battery just a good ol' capacitor, like I'm already using. It's all theoretical of course as it hasn't been done yet.
In braking mode the generator/motor on the crankshaft charged a supercap; in acceleration mode the supercap fed the stored energy back to the crankshaft.
Of course rear wheel braking in a road racer does not amount to much. But imagine a light, powerful generator/motor front hub. In braking mode you would be able to recover a huge amount of energy, and in acceleration mode you could have all wheel drive (very useful, with the front wheel off the ground).
Joking apart, I've been doing some brainstorming regarding a Freetech50 design. It should have continuously variable transmission, but without the losses of a scooter belt drive.
The efficiency of electric motors is already very good. The efficiency of generators still leaves something to be desired but assuming we can correct that, a generator + motor could handle all the functions of clutch, gearbox, brakes and energy recovery. We could have a 50 cc engine on full song all the time, charging a supercapacitor, even while braking. That would about double the available amount of power over a race distance.
As a rulemaker (yes, I do that too) I would have to add just one line to the rulebook: 'any battery or supercapacitor should be empty at the start of the race'.
How well the energy stored in the fuel is used, should be up to the constructor.




).
Reply With Quote







Bookmarks