Can your scope give you an FFT of the pickup? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_Fourier_transform)
That way you can see a single peak at the current RPM and if it moves the single peak will move up or down the X axis, but if it is randomly missing revolutions you will get several peaks.
Hmmmm. Depending on how much crank inertia you have that can prove problematic. If your tune is spot on then it can run very happily. But if it isn't any sudden accelerations and decelerations can't be accounted for, which can put your spark and injection timing way on the piss, which just makes it all worse.
ECU's
surly the only thing two stoke about the ecotrons is the low ampage fuel pump? swap it for a microsquirt/megasquirt
on the other hand i can understand the urge to not lose to the bastarding thing, work damn you!
1200 for the link!![]()
The link is pretty flash bit of Kit, A much earlier version wasi what the Britten Ran Shhhhhhhhhhhh (forget i said that)
Few people would seen or heard of this i had just seen the odd reference.
I could have posted this in ESE or the chassis thread (might anyway).
Tell you the truth i wouldn't mind building a replica anyone got a Crescent 500 3 engine (lying about, they want to give away like)
This last pic i think is another version maybe?![]()
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Some more Crescent engine pics 500cc 2 stroke 3.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Fuel Injected Suzuki 750
A very interesting collection of links to all sorts:- http://teamheronsuzuki.blogspot.nl/2...tam-rg500.html
What about just using the smallest injector possible that will supply the fuel at max, only. At start and low throttle openings it will be rich even at minimum pulse width. Opening the throttle will admit more air but you don't have to programme increased fuel until conditions require it. I don't know when those conditions would be, it would depend on the injector and the engine. Typically carbs are set rich at the very bottom of the range and they work OK. The way I see it if you had to have more than 15% throttle to admit enough air to correct the mixture even at minimum pulse width it should be rideable. How often is a race motor used below say 50% of max revs with less than 15% throttle? I reckon it would "blip" fine and be raceable. We aren't talking about a road bike here where it must be sweet from idle to max.
Fixed that for ye.
A carb 'set rich' doesn't necessarily mean a rich mixture. This is a fundamental difference between a carb and EFI.Typically carbs are set rich at the very bottom of the range and they work OK.
Rideability is less critical on a race bike? You haven't done much drifting lately, have you?We aren't talking about a road bike here where it must be sweet from idle to max.
Yes, worth a try.
If all else fails I can try it on the Bemer I am customizing. Chambers and I have both got K100 basket cases that we are going to make into bober chopper cruisers complete with extended forks, low rider sprung seats, tassels, peanut tanks and fat rear tiers. The bikes will be striped down and all about the engine.
Probably offend the Euro Fundamentalists and State Side compressor riders all in one go ......
Not my bike, but don't you just love that engine.
Maybe I could have done a 2T like this high powered BSA Bantam with an RG500 based engine.
http://teamheronsuzuki.blogspot.nl/2013/12/bsa-bantam-rg500.html
With the Bemer I am aiming for something that's OK to ride slow so I do not loose my license (again) and great for cruising the cafes.
could allways use a carb until the end of the needle then inject the rest
More progress, Matt has been in contact and asked for my latest recorded runs and photos of the scope traces for analysis. He expects to be able to get back to me Wednesday. In the mean time I will have a look at the quality of the trigger signal from the ignition pickup.
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Bookmarks