Page 900 ...
To find the good stuff. follow the link to see how to view all the images on the thread and their associated posts.
http://www.vemssupport.com/forum/ind...opic,97.0.html
Before calibrating an engine, it is first useful to have some concept of what you are trying to control. The following is a fairly brief overview of the internal combustion engine, which will hopefully give you a basic understanding of some fundamental principles and terminology, so that when you change a number in a box on your laptop, you have some idea of the effect it is having on the engine.
""Fuelling Theory ... Lets start with the theory then. We are concerned with spark ignition gasoline engines here. I am only going to cover gasoline, since Diesel is for trucks and diggers, and alcohol is for drinking and drag racing.""
http://195.159.109.134/vemsuk/forum/...opic,97.0.html
Tonight's effort. The Beast is starting to snarl and it will pull away in top gear on the dyno from 3500rpm and WOT, try that with your carburetor.
Attachment 292749
Red line is the best ever using a carb with this old cylinder and the Blue line is where I am at with fuel injection. In all fairness for a proper comparison it needs a proper head (the old head suited a dished piston) the original ignition map and chamber and a generator for the EFI. But I am pretty excited about the Ecotrons fuel injection system as its starting to be very easy to work with.
I think this EFI business is going to work out OK.
If they weren't such evil fekers and spent some r&d on emissions, imagine what a stonking basis that layout would have made for a road bike. They sound like 2 CR250s and then some.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Ok finally got the O2 and exhaust temperature sensors installed.
Ecotrons has been pushing me to do this, they need the Lambda info so they can better help me develop a good Alpha-N map.
No idea if they are in the optimum place but they will do for a start.
Had to change to un-leaded fuel but still have to drop the compression a touch to suit the 96.
The air fuel meter and Lambda controller/transmitter.
Using the cursors, with Cursor-1 I can see that at N_b 7206 rpm LamWO2 is rich at 0.85 and Cursor-2 lean at 1,247 Lam at 9120 rpm.
Now that it all seems to be working I am really looking forward to getting a bit of time on the dyno to play with this thing.
Has anyone else been playing about with EGT probes and had weird readings?
I installed a dual Koso with Stinger probes on my MC28 (almost a bucket). These are 110mm from the piston face. Ozzy jetted it up on his dyno and we were getting 1250deg peak and running nicely.
Fast forward to a session at Manfield and they peaked at 1440deg. It didn't feel lean at all, but slowed down and came off WFO as the revs came up and managed to keep temp down to 1250 again. After speaking with one dude with an Aprilia/Wobbly 400, he kinda put the fear of god into me about the readings. Well, the bike sat in the garage for a while as I was distracted with the new GSXR100 and a wedding. Pulled off the heads and exhaust, expecting to see some sign of damage, but nothing.
I am wondering if the probe is installed too far into the gas stream? The installation notes specify halfway in, but I am not even that far in. I didn't do a plug chop, but as you can see, there is no sign of damage on the piston crown, and no ring smear, etc either...
![]()
Both are looking good, but do not move them any closer to the cylinder. And remember to heat the lambda sensor before starting the engine; otherwise oil will soon choke it.
1,247 is definitely too lean but 0,85 is about optimal for best power. That goes for both two- and four-strokes.with Cursor-1 I can see that at N_b 7206 rpm LamWO2 is rich at 0.85 and Cursor-2 lean at 1,247 Lam at 9120 rpm.
[/QUOTE]
That's not a 250 cylinder ! I thought that the probe had to protrude to half way in the pipe but I could be wrong . Mine is 110mm from the piston if I remember correctly from earlier discussions .
My readings would go over 1250 but I would just roll off and reject until it remained at 1200 ish on avgas .
Is it possible that the colour is not a true reflection of a wide open 30 second plug chop ?
From PitLane:- http://www.pit-lane.biz/t4072p20-gp1...vermars-part-3
Direct fuel injection ... really big crankcase volumes.Originally Posted by Frits Overmars
Himmmmm ....now how could I get a huge amount more crankcase volume??? nope nothing obvious there.
In any badly tuned 2T you can easily get readings over 1300*F and survive,ONLY if the setup is not optimal.
If the com is too low for the fuel, or if the timing is overly retarded, then the excess heat produced late in the combustion cycle is dumped into the pipe
and thus alot less is soaked into the piston.
But just the mere fact the engine did survive that insane abuse, points to the fact that the setup is nowhere near correct.
It still amazes me though that people have gauges on the bike, skid around the track, see death numbers on the screen then ride back to the pit and tell everyone about what just happened.
Why is the gauge there ? To help tune the engine,but what if the com was perfect and the timing dialled in correctly on a dyno.
The same rider would then do several laps - watching the temps scream past 1250, lock it up at the end of the straight - THEN come in and say " I saw 1300 and shit ive siezed it, bastard thing".
If a correctly setup engine cannot be held under 1200*F by the jetting, then it should be richened immediately so that it can be.
THEN, go down one size at a time and approx 50* rise should occur for each change, shooting for a max on AvGas of 1250*F.
If the change produces less than 50* delta in egt then that indicates that you are approaching deto rather than making more power from the extra heat of combustion.
The opposite is true as well, if more than 50* is seen with 1 jet leaner, then you can be sure the setup is not correct for the fuel and a heap of unused heat is being dumped into the pipe.
But, using excess fuel to cool the combustion process will not make anywhere near the actual power available ,if the ignition and com was optimised.
This means as a general rule for a fast watercooled 125 cylinder on AvGas that the com is close to 16:1 and the peak power timing is close to 15* - any numbers alot less than that
then you dont need AvGas,and or you do need to rethink the tuning.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
2 stroke new lap record there too. Just thought I'd saytoday. Just in case someone beats it tomorrow. Actually I think Kel and Rick are 2nd and third fastest on smokers.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are currently 22 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 21 guests)
Bookmarks