Page 56 of 2629 FirstFirst ... 6465455565758661061565561056 ... LastLast
Results 826 to 840 of 39427

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #826
    Join Date
    5th January 2009 - 19:25
    Bike
    RS/GP125
    Location
    Waitakere City, Auckland
    Posts
    88

    Talking

    Well at least I am pulling 16+ HP now Carl. Started as a base line of about 13Hp. Nice crisp sound and plenty of torque. I will get down on Saturday and run some test laps. Cully is running the engine out of the red bike at the moment while he makes some bearing repairs on his engine. Looking forward to some fast laps on Sat/Sunday

  2. #827
    Join Date
    5th January 2009 - 19:25
    Bike
    RS/GP125
    Location
    Waitakere City, Auckland
    Posts
    88

    Talking

    Well at least I am pulling 16+ HP now Carl. Started as a base line of about 13
    Nice crisp sound and plenty of torque. I will get down on Saturday and run some test laps. Cully is running the engine out of the red bike at the moment while make some bearing repairs on his engine. looking forward to some fast laps on Sat/Sunday

  3. #828
    Join Date
    16th November 2005 - 07:48
    Bike
    I just lost count
    Location
    The District of Waipa
    Posts
    3,607
    Quote Originally Posted by Ned Kelly View Post
    Well at least I am pulling 16+ HP now Carl. Started as a base line of about 13
    Nice crisp sound and plenty of torque
    Ahh shit, looks like I am in real trouble now the A grade mid pack just got real interesting. Time to take a concrete and throw it into the corners harder.

    For the record Qkkid was in my bed, not the other way round

    Quote Originally Posted by Yow Ling View Post
    Pumba is a wise man.

  4. #829
    Join Date
    26th April 2006 - 12:52
    Bike
    Several
    Location
    Hutt Valley
    Posts
    5,120
    The FXR is kind of like the benchmark bucket at the moment isn't it?
    I seem to remember Richban reporting a dyno figure like 17.5hp If thats correct it is quite alot to compete with.
    (Ahh Found it and added link)

    I never seemed to meet THE GP125 at Kaitoke at any point but judging by what others have said it was probably easily the fastest staight line bike there in the weekend. Quite alot faster than any FXR there.

    Is all that because the GP makes beter tourque or somthing?
    Tex on his GP 125 seemed to have heaps more effective power than I had on the overcarbed FXR I was on, yet I cant imagine it being much (if any) more powerful in peak power.
    Heinz Varieties

  5. #830
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,479
    Quote Originally Posted by koba View Post
    The FXR is kind of like the benchmark bucket at the moment isn't it?
    I seem to remember Richban reporting a dyno figure like 17.5hp If thats correct it is quite alot to compete with.
    (Ahh Found it and added link)
    FXR's making 17.5 rw-hp (I thought they were less) and with their wider 4-stroke power band they will be a lot to compete with. Looks like our GP's arn't there yet.

    .

  6. #831
    Join Date
    5th June 2005 - 18:35
    Bike
    CBR 150.RGV250 Bucket
    Location
    UNZUD
    Posts
    355
    Blog Entries
    1
    I never seemed to meet THE GP125 at Kaitoke at any point but judging by what others have said it was probably easily the fastest staight line bike there in the weekend. Quite alot faster than any FXR there.

    Is all that because the GP makes beter tourque or somthing?
    Tex on his GP 125 seemed to have heaps more effective power than I had on the overcarbed FXR I was on, yet I cant imagine it being much (if any) more powerful in peak power.[/QUOTE]


    I'd doubt mt GP125 has more power than an FXR, it,s a matter of being able to use it. TZ's GP would pull away from me on the straights even tho I'd got a much better run out of a corner, then I'd have to take him under braking. Track knowledge counts for alot.
    Life is a lesson-if I bother to listen

  7. #832
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    20,563
    Blog Entries
    2
    Bearing in mind differences in Dynos my understanding is an FXR std probably does 16hp with a wide spread. Makes sense that Rich's mildly tuned FXR does 17.5. When the guy put the GN or whatever carb on yours the chance that he put the right jet in it is slim.

    So a decent GP with nigh on 20hp & a decent spread should be an easy match for an FXR. The news that the bikes in wgtn aren't highly developed is pretty old. A decent rider on a ok handling bike with some good power can do the buss. I'm not saying I fall into that category but when I had the H I used to regularly just walk away from the field with 18hp & it was quick turning but not particularly pretty handling. I think if you put that old engine in a decent frame with a good rider he should do the same. - Oh look, Glen did just that & on his first outing was right up there. He'll go further with some more time on it.

    The FXRs are a great starting bike, but the GP should have more potential, or at least equivalent.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  8. #833
    Join Date
    17th February 2008 - 17:10
    Bike
    gp125 rg50 rs125hybrid
    Location
    Helensville
    Posts
    2,882
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave View Post
    The FXRs are a great starting bike, but the GP should have more potential, or at least equivalent.
    the GP Sux when you compair them standard
    17 wheels ???? dont think so
    brakes what brakes
    the frame is made from noodle straws and bungie cords

    as a standard bike the fxr is just soooo much better
    but it's booring

    the gp needs to have 17" rims stiched on to it (not to hard)
    and slight mods to the engine

    then you have got 17 hp (or there abouts)
    and a bike that handles like shite and has no brakes


    just like all the fast guys back in the 80's

    put the gp into another frame now that is potential say 17.5 hp (19.5 maby) in an rs

    dan then it shows up how bad I ride crybaby:

    I think I'm just going to ride the rg50 this year
    "Instructions are just the manufacturers opinion on how to install it" Tim Taylor of "Tool Time"
    “Saying what we think gives us a wider conversational range than saying what we know.” - Cullen Hightower

  9. #834
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    20,563
    Blog Entries
    2
    for sure the GPs handle terribly std. Gyro had a very fast watercooled 100 back in the day. Felt like the front end wasn't connected though. Yes the RG50 handles great in comparison, much fun to ride & teaches you to peddle faster to keep up with the bigger bikes or in Auckland you aren't short of 50 competition (as we were very strong in 50 class when Jay & Hamish were riding & Fishe & Chris Sales before that. Miss those days).
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  10. #835
    Join Date
    18th October 2007 - 08:20
    Bike
    1970 Vespa ss90
    Location
    Schärding
    Posts
    1,831
    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    Interestingly the motor (second pic) with the original non-squish open hemisphere head made the most power, 18hp @ 10,000rpm and has a sharp peak @ 11,500rpm. Not sure why it has this peak, but have a few ideas as I have seen similar curves on MOTA and changes to the exhaust port width plumped the curve up just before the peak.

    The bike in pic 1 has a squish head and high compression. I suspect its over compressed and that is why the power is dropping at the top end. I think that if we reduce the compression ratio of the first bike we will get more Hp and a graph more like the second pic.


    .
    Yea, that's the interesting thing about cylinder heads and compression set ups, particularly with gear box ratios that are unsuited to racing (GP125's,ax100's small frame Vespa's etc)

    So many people (previously myself included) forget about the fact that to "copy" alot of two stroke performance stuff from racing circles is not always applicable, due to the fact on the sort of machines we use for tuning, because of the gear box ratios, require long wide power bands, where as "real" race stuff normally has 6 closely spaced gears, enabling larger exhaust port areas (for one thing) that will give you heaps more peak power (at the expense of torque).

    A good example of an excellent bucket tuning motor (as we all know) is an MB100, not only for the fact that it is crankcase induction (a clear advantage), but almost as importantly, you can fit the MB50 gearbox (6 speed), and not only are you able to make good power with these engines, but you are also, with the 6 speed close ratio gearbox, able to "keep the engine in the power"..if you had a well tuned 22 P.S MB100 with an original 5 speed gear box, I suspect you would have trouble when you went from 4th to 5th gear......

    But that has been covered a few times!

    Interesting about the curve shape and the compression ratios/squish head.

    Your thoughts (in my experience) are correct in regards to high comp (over compressed), and short "peaky" curves.

    For street tuned engines, I run about 13.6:1 and actually don't use squish heads at all anymore, as I found that since I never really exceeded that ratio, a squish head was not required,(as there is little chance of detonation at this level) as well as that fact that even with lower ratios than 13.6:1 squish heads, while if used with higher compressions will produce more peak power (at the expense of power width) with lower ratios the power was the same peak, but narrower that with out.....

    Basically, with a ratio of around 13.6:1, you have alot more "over-rev", and, in this situation, that is what you want to achieve!

    Honestly, the curves you just posted are not bad at all (really) and personally, I believe that you can achieve something like 17 NM of torque (12.5 FT/LB) and 19 P.S with a GP125 engine, while making power for approx 2000 RPM.

    Much more suitable for a 5 speed box!

    Before you want to change your pipe design, if it is possible, can you make the changes to your primary compression that you discussed, get a standard (oringed) head, with compression ratio as I mentioned, and run that on the dyno.....

    For the pipe design, this would be a really good reference for me!

    Also, I while back (first few posts) I mentioned about exhaust port and transfer timings of 188 deg and 131 deg (respectively), which you pointed out where the same as a tuned RM125 (I think)

    I really believe that this is more suitable for what you are doing....

  11. #836
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    20,563
    Blog Entries
    2
    MB is actually 4 speed std, although you can fit the MT50 5 speed (or MB50 6 speed).
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  12. #837
    Join Date
    26th June 2005 - 21:11
    Bike
    Honda NSR300 track hack
    Location
    Pukerua Bay
    Posts
    4,089
    I don't think that the MB is crankcase induction either, The reeds go into the back of the barrel, I was under the impression a case inducted motor was when the reeds feed straight in the back of the crankcase, leaving the opportunity to play with quite significant boost port sizes and more space for transfers.

    Sorry to take this off topic, what head volume do you think would be optimum for the H100 dave? I was going to set it up at about 14:1 as the gear box works well, so a narrow power band isn't a problem.


  13. #838
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,479
    Quote Originally Posted by SS90 View Post

    Before you want to change your pipe design, if it is possible, can you make the changes to your primary compression that you discussed, get a standard (oringed) head, with compression ratio as I mentioned, and run that on the dyno.....

    For the pipe design, this would be a really good reference for me!
    The 2nd pic max hp 18.3 @ 10,000rpm and max torque 10.4 ft-lbs @ 8,500rpm. Bike belongs to Chambers, and the motor is basically a standard GP125 with a bit trimed of the top of the cylinder and fitted with a RM spec pipe.

    This is more the spec motor I want. Working from memary here, (my notes are at work), Specs are:-

    1.75mm machined from the top of a std cylinder. "O" ringed, Ex opens 86 ATDC, 64% of Bore Width, which is std, Trans 114 ATDC, Std Inlet Opens 145 BTDC Closes 55 ATDC,

    Std Head, no head gasket, Compresion ratio 7:1 with No Squish, Primary compresion 1.45:1, KX80 ignition, Ignition timing at a guess 24-26 BTDC with no auto retard, GP125 24mm carb with modified bell mouth and 105 main jet,

    RM spec pipe. Max hp 18.3 @ 10,000rpm and max torque 10.4 ft-lbs @ 8,500rpm. A wide flat power curve with a little peak at the end. A similar motor with a RG250 pipe made 17Hp.

    .

  14. #839
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,479
    Quote Originally Posted by SS90 View Post
    Honestly, the curves you just posted are not bad at all (really) and personally, I believe that you can achieve something like 17 NM of torque (12.5 FT/LB) and 19 P.S with a GP125 engine, while making power for approx 2000 RPM.

    Much more suitable for a 5 speed box!....
    A Handy Coverter:- http://www.mr2ownersclub.com/converter.htm

    Yes your right, we have about 18-19 Ps and 14 Nm now (1 ft lb = 1.356 Nm ...) so 17 Nm would make this bike very drivable.

    Pic 1 is Chambers GP125 and Pic 2 is a Dyno graph of the RM125 from Graham Bells book. 22.6 Hp @ 10500 Rpm and 12.3 Ft-Lb at 9,500 Rpm. 1000 Rpm between peaks.

    This will be my aim 19 or so Hp and 12.5 ft/lb (now 10.5 ft/lb) with 2000 Rpm between peaks. The old trade off, sacrifice a bit of Hp for more torque and a broader power band.

    So the problem is more about increasing the torque than making more Hp.

    How can we use the new style of porting to increase the torque? SS90 do you have any suggestions?

    .
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Dyno Run Chambers GP125.jpg 
Views:	59 
Size:	373.6 KB 
ID:	126764   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RM-Bells Book.jpg 
Views:	55 
Size:	285.5 KB 
ID:	126765  

  15. #840
    Join Date
    24th July 2008 - 18:01
    Bike
    Honda RS 125 1992
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    717
    Quote Originally Posted by Buckets4Me View Post
    the GP Sux when you compair them standard
    put the gp into another frame now that is potential say 17.5 hp (19.5 maby) in an rs

    dan then it shows up how bad I ride crybaby:

    I think I'm just going to ride the rg50 this year
    Hey Carl I will give your GP RS a run for you any time
    Do you want a run on my 150 diesel LOL!!!
    See you on Suday

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 157 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 157 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •