Its the side holes close to the piston bosses I'd be most concerned about
Its the side holes close to the piston bosses I'd be most concerned about
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Better make sure you are not dependent on hope, luck, faith etc, TeeZee. And you could shorten your throttle cable. Those twists will spoil the rider's feel.
I think the slot in the piston in combination with the middle injector is a good idea. I'm not so sure about the other mods...
I dont know if the oscilloscope has a screen "stop" and capture facility.
When I run the TZ400 system on the bench I will see if it can be done - or maybe I could use Gadwin to capture one cycle, not sure!
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
I am not sure about the mechanical integrity of the other mods either, but without expensive and time consuming modeling techniques there is not much more to be done than best guess and hope.
In the scheme of things this little step into the dark is really not that big a deal, if it all goes tits up, the sun will still rise tomorrow, so we can live a little on the edge and see what happens
Whatever the outcome we will be able to build on knowledge gained.
With squishy things like base gaskets and a composite head gasket its a bit of a trick to get the cylinder stack height right for the required amount of squish.
Also piston rock makes it a challenge to measure the squish properly. I use looped pieces of soft solder at the sides of the piston but maybe all four quadrants would be better. Anyway like all measurements its up to you to work out better ways of making them.
Do what everybody else in the world does and find yourself some illegitimate software.
Solidworks or Creo and Ansys FEA.
May I suggest a torrent from thepiratebay.
As long as you aren't selling the products you are pretty damn unlikely to be chased down by a hoard of lawyers.
I hadn't thought of a pirated copy of Solid Works.
I can see it shows the stress areas but certain failure or not? quite probably if you know how to use it, I guess, certainly good for optimizing things anyway.
In a couple of days the dyno will pass judgement for sure, and give the modification a clear pass or fail. But I can see now that if I had been at all familiar with using this sort of software I could have had a much better idea of the likely outcome, next time.
https://d2t1xqejof9utc.cloudfront.ne...pdf?1333781293
Here is a Masters Thesis on dynamic load analysis, interesting.
I forgot solidworks has a built in FEA engine.
It will be able to tell you stress at each point (and also stiffness but probably less important for this application) and then use matweb or similar to try and predict how many cycles it will last. I would suggest doing a little reading of fatigue of non ferrous metals. Finite fatigue life and all that jazz.
No need to do dynamic analysis. A static structural analysis will tell you most of what you need to know. Just calculate forces on the piston from F=ma, Pressure on the crown from the combustion chamber and friction in the bore and apply them to the piston with the piston pin fixed in space. Getting the contraints accurate is most of the battle.
I used to crack Suzuki pistons at every bucket meeting right through where those side holes are. I replaced them every 2nd meeting. It may be better without the piston port in the back wall.
There are currently 17 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 16 guests)
Bookmarks