I think it comes down to the higher speed at which the smaller "crankcase" volume attains its peak efficiency.
With the conventional style engines reducing the primary comp to anywhere near the same level had required the crankcase airflow and transfer flow to become so hugely stifled it became irrelevant, I believe it was because it created huge boundary friction in the areas around the crank wheels. plus other flow airflow restrictions.Thus I muse separating the crankcase might be the difference.
Also it would seem the ryger benefits from modern transfer control and durations. As devloped over the last 40 years.
or it might just be overhyped horse poo.There is an engine speed at which maximum air delivery to the cylinder occurs, and that this engine speed is inversely proportional to crankcase volume, but that the maximum value changes only slightly with changes in crankcase volume. To put it another way, the crankcase-pump's volumetric efficiency is nearly constant, but the engine speed at which it attains maximum efficiency rises as crankcase clearance volume is reduced. pumping losses (horsepower absorbed in doing this work) rise as to the third power of compression ratio. Researcher Fujio Nagao, of Kyoto University
Bookmarks